Violating consent is something most BDSM and sex-related sites have multitudes of articles on. Why? Because breaking consent is fucking terrible, whether it’s done deliberately or by accident. In most cases, though, the consent violators called out are in Dominant roles of a D/s relationship. I’m here to tell you; submissives violate consent too.  

Violating Consent isn't Just a Dom/Domme Thing:


Double standards exist in the BDSM world too


While most understand how serious it is for a Dom/Domme to abuse their submissive’s consent, many people overlook and/or flat out dismiss the reverse scenario. At first, I figured it was because most of the submissive violators I’ve known were small, while their counterparts were strong and Dominant. It’s a lot harder for a 130lb person to overcome a 220lb muscle-bulked, super Dominant person. The more I spoke with others about subs violating consent, the more I realized that Doms/Dommes are also abused and having their rights infringed upon. This is just as dangerous as them violating their subs.

Not recognizing the severity of anyone violating consent and boundaries is hugely problematic because it means we’re tolerating abusive behavior.


violating consentI’ve witnessed several cases where a sub violated the consent of their Dom/Domme. Sometimes this crossing of boundaries is touching the Dom/Domme when they said no. For example: kissing after being told no, refusing to let go during a hug or embrace, and tickling when the person has clearly stated they don’t like it and not to do it. These may not be horrific sounding examples, but they are a violation and can destroy a relationship quickly.

The hardest part about these sorts of violations is they aren’t blatantly obvious or sexually abusive. To some, it might feel like a sexual violation, but not all will feel that way. The problem with these types of behaviors is that they send a clear signal to the Dom/Domme saying, “My needs supersede yours.” It shows no regard for the violated person. It also tells the D that their feelings aren’t relevant. That they can be stepped on simply because they’re Dominant and can ‘handle it’.

After talking with several Doms about this, I’ve come to a conclusion. One of the reasons this is so often dismissed is simply because the Dom/Domme is so, Dominant. Most are confident, in control, and have no problem at all putting a violator in their place. This becomes even easier when the Dom/Domme is much larger and stronger than the sub.

The general thought being:
Dominants can take care of themselves. That’s the biggest issue. Just because a Dominant can put a sub in their place, doesn’t mean the submissive’s behavior is acceptable. Nor does that fact excuse the sub’s behavior.

Subs that deliberately violate consent are abusive.


Everyone has the right to be respected. No matter what side of the D/s relationship they’re on. We all have the right to feel safe as well. Understanding that consent is a two-way street and that both parties must adhere to the rules and boundaries laid out before them, is vital to the success of any D/s relationship.

Sienna Saint-Cyr writes erotica and blogs about kink, poly, body image, and most things relating. Follow her at siennasaintcyr.wordpress.com or on Twitter @siennasaintcyr.
Images by Flogit Jennarson and Open Source Dude via Flickr.com

YOU MAY ALSO LIKE

1 comment

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!


Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.


Sign In Now


[…] Source: Why Violating Consent isn’t Just a D Thing – Fetish.com […]

Share this comment


Link to comment
Share on other sites

Aus unserem Magazin