When using automation to censor text reaches its limits

[PeggableFucker]

... And then you get accused of publishing forbidden details.

A profile in french I was reading had this strange "#we replace some words with this text#" thing in the middle of a word.
It took me some time to work it out.
The profile said: pour l'#...#nt
That is pour l'instant. French for For the moment.
So we can write instant BECAUSE IT CONTAINS INSTA.
Just like Don't is edited in the Epstein files because it contains Don.😏😉

Congrats fet. Another great job done.

Do you have ANY intention to correct this?

And will you let people comment on this thread or close it quickly, as you usually do with threads that don't make you look good?

Time will tell, I guess

[CaraVirt]

@PeggableFucker thanks for your request/feedback 🙂

Automatic filtering systems are in place to help en*** our community guidelines. While they usually work well, there can be occasional limitations or unintended results.

We continuously review and improve these systems to reduce such cases.
If you notice specific examples where content is affected incorrectly, feel free to report them so we can take a closer look.

I’ll close this thread here, as this topic isn’t intended for ongoing discussion in the Forum.

Greetings, Carmen FET Team