Website Logo
LoginSignup
English

The Problem With Sexual Orientation Labels

Are 'kink' and 'poly' sexual orientation labels? Abi Brown looks at the way we define ourselves and our relationships.
 

Everyone has a gender orientation of some sort. It's about how they define their own gender, but also how they feel and behave as a result of that definition. Moreover, how do those things leave them feeling about their own body? I’m quite fond of the dictionary definition of ‘orientation’, which looks quite simple on the face of it. Orientation is defined as "a person's basic attitude, beliefs, or feelings in relation to a particular subject or issue." However, the more you think about it, the more you realise that simplicity is kind of deceptive.


A beginner’s guide to sexual orientation labels

Most people have a sexual orientation. This determines which genders of other people you’d like to have sexual and/or romantic relationships with. What is more, this is probably best expressed as a spectrum that has homosexuality at one end and heterosexuality at the other, with bisexuality and pansexuality in the middle.

The Y-axis of that spectrum is your romantic orientation.  This is about who you actually fall in love with and want to have romantic relationships with. While it’s often the same as your sexual orientation it’s certainly not universally so. I’m sure that heterosexual homoromantics exist, but the more common example is someone who is bisexual or pansexual while also being homoromantic or heteroromantic.

But really it’s a three-dimensional graph with a Z-axis, because we’re also all on a spectrum that describes how sexual we are. Asexual people don’t feel sexual attraction to anybody, regardless of gender, and may or may not experience romantic attraction. Furthermore, demisexual people only feel sexual attraction to those with whom they are already in an established romantic relationship.
 

Taking sexual orientation labels to the next level

Once you’ve figured out all that stuff, the next step is to think about how you would like your relationships to function in practice. All relationships have rules and boundaries of some sort, whether they’re made explicit or not. One couple might have a rule that says “don’t fantasise sexually about anyone who isn’t the other partner”, while another might have “send me a text if you’re going to fuck someone at a party”.

Additionally, there’s what kind of sex you want to have. For a lot of people, it seems like this is innate, but ‘kinky’ and ‘vanilla’ are a bit overly simplistic. What about people who get really into tantra, or are devoted to the idea of the Freudian pleasure principle, for example?

Furthermore, you’ve got people who enjoy some of the things we’d call fetish, kink or BDSM, but don’t feel like they’re necessary. In contrast, there are the people who just can’t seem to get into vanilla sex at all. Besides, the whole thing is just too huge to contemplate. There are thousands of different kinds of kinks and fetishes, as well as a zillion versions of BDSM relationships.

I’m wary of labelling polyamory as a sexual orientation because it’s just an umbrella term for a sub-set of something that is universal to relationships. With kink, I’m wary of it because I think there are simply too many individual options. If “what kind of sex you like to have” is a sexual orientation spectrum, it’s so vast that it is rendered essentially meaningless.
 

The bottom line of sexual orientation

This all seems incredibly complicated, and there are lots of people who react to it all by just going “why do we need all these definitions? Why can’t we just get on with it?” I can see their point, but it’s crucial that we think and talk about this stuff. There isn’t a person on this planet who wouldn’t ultimately benefit from living in a world where the full spectrum of human experience was better tolerated and understood.

There are a lot of terms and words and spectrums of sexual orientation involved, because to a certain extent what we’re doing here is battling hypocognition. Most of the time, people can only fully understand an idea for which they have both language and a framework. These are complex ideas, and relatively new ones at that. Indeed, it is the kink and BDSM communities leading the effort to give people the language and the framework that they need to understand them.

Just to make everything even more complicated, the extreme ends of this spectrum of sexual orientation are sometimes described collectively as “monosexuality”. This refers to someone who is attracted exclusively to one gender.


Abi Brown is a freelance writer and general pen-for-hire devoted to genre fiction, social justice and M.A.C lipstick. Follow her on her website or @see_abi_write.


Has this article inspired you to explore a different sexual orientation? If so, join fetish.com for free and broaden your sexual horizons.

 

Magazine Banner - Join Now [Fetish.com] (1)-min.jpg

 

Comment

Comments


    Related Discussions

    1 Comment
    1 Comment

    Related Discussions

    Bdsm

    Acreditam que as práticas BDSM impacta na regulação emocional e alívio do estresse ? Quais impactos? 5 Likes 3 Replies· 5 days ago

    Does kink reveal who we are, or who we allow ourselves to become?

    THE SHADOW SELF There is the person the world knows, the person one believes oneself to be, and perhaps the person who appears when nobody is watching. Are they all the same person? Consider someone who spends their days making decisions, carrying responsibility and maintaining control. Yet, in a private dynamic, they find pleasure in surrendering it. Or someone who is usually quiet and accommodating, but discovers a commanding, assertive side through a Dominant role. Is kink revealing something that was always there? Is it creating room for something that ordinary life rarely permits? The shadow we keep Carl Jung used the term shadow to describe aspects of the self that remain unacknowledged, disowned or outside one's preferred self-image. It is an interesting lens through which to consider kink, provided one does not mistake it for a diagnosis. A fantasy about surrender does not necessarily mean someone secretly wants to be powerless. A fascination with dominance does not automatically mean someone is controlling. And enjoying a particular role does not mean that role defines the entirety of one's personality. Sometimes fantasy is simply a place where the mind can explore possibilities without having to turn them into reality. Permission to become something else Perhaps this is where the psychology becomes interesting. A person who carries responsibility all day may find relief in consensual surrender. Someone who rarely feels heard may enjoy discovering their authority. A Caregiver dynamic may offer room for nurturing, structure and reassurance, while a Little may find comfort in playfulness, vulnerability and being cared for. None of these experiences necessarily contradict the person's everyday identity. The submissive is not incapable of making decisions. The Dominant is not required to command every room. The Caregiver does not have to nurture everyone, and the little does not stop being an adult. The dynamic creates a context. The people within it give that context meaning. The question of authenticity There is a temptation to assume that the private self is the more authentic one, as though the public self were merely a mask. Glitch is not entirely convinced. Perhaps both are authentic. Different environments invite different parts of a person to come forward. A role can reveal an overlooked quality, offer an unfamiliar experience, or simply provide an enjoyable form of expression. And perhaps the more important distinction is not between the real self and the hidden self, but between what one genuinely desires and what one feels expected to desire. A fantasy does not have to become an identity. An identity does not have to become a performance. And curiosity does not create an obligation to act. A few questions for the curious 1. Does kink reveal a side of oneself that already exists, or does it help develop a side that might otherwise remain unexplored? 2. Can someone be fundamentally different inside a dynamic without being any less authentic outside it? 3. Do Dominants and submissives gravitate towards their roles because of their everyday personalities, or sometimes because those roles offer a contrast? 4. Is there a difference between discovering a hidden desire and simply enjoying the freedom to imagine it? 5. Should every fantasy be understood, or are some better left as fantasies? Perhaps the shadow is not always something dark, dangerous or forbidden. Sometimes it is simply a part of oneself that has not yet been given a language, a context or permission to exist. And perhaps understanding oneself does not mean acting upon every desire. It means being able to look at one honestly, without shame, assumption or the need to become it. Glitch suspects the shadow has rather more nuance than its reputation suggests. 72 Likes 19 Replies· 7 days ago

    KINK: THE FORBIDDEN FRUIT

    The psychology and Glitchcore Would kink still be desirable if it were no longer forbidden? Does one desire something because it genuinely appeals to them, or does knowing it is forbidden make it more appealing? Consider taboo. The act itself may be ordinary. Introduce a restriction, attach a consequence, surround it with secrecy, and suddenly it acquires a different psychological weight. Within the lifestyle (BDSMk), it becomes rather interesting. Before the body, there is the mind. Kink does not necessarily begin with physical contact. It can begin with curiosity, imagination, anticipation and the meaning one attaches to an experience. A Dominant establishes a protocol. A submissive chooses to follow it. A Caregiver offers structure and reassurance. A Little finds comfort in a chosen headspace, familiar routines, praise or playful rules. Even online, two people can develop rituals, expectations, boundaries and an exchange of power. There may be no physical collar, yet its symbolism can carry meaning. No hand holding the leash, yet the anticipation of "await further instructions" can be tantalizing. Physical intimacy does add a dimensional element, but it does not create the psychological foundation. The psychology of temptation Psychologists call one relevant mechanism psychological reactance. When people feel their freedom of choice is being restricted, the restricted option can become more attractive. Trying to suppress a thought can also make it more persistent. But this does not mean prohibition creates a kink. It may intensify an existing curiosity, give it a narrative or make it more difficult to ignore. Perhaps the same question applies to power exchange. Is a submissive drawn to obedience itself, or to the trust and respect behind it? Does a little enjoy the rule, or the reassurance of having a Caregiver who provides structure? Does a Dominant find satisfaction in bringing structure, or in being trusted with the responsibility that comes with authority? And sometimes, the attraction is simply to the fantasy. Remove the anticipation, and the experience may lose its appeal. A negotiated limit is not an invitation to push. A safeword is not disobedience. Submission remains a choice. Glitch's observation' Perhaps the forbidden fruit does not always change its flavour. Perhaps it changes the mind of the one looking at it. An online dynamic can be meaningful without physical contact. A protocol is more than a list of instructions. A command is more than a sentence. A Caregiver is more than someone who establishes rules. Their significance comes from the understanding between the people who create that dynamic. Glitch suspects that the body is sometimes given too much credit for a conversation the mind started long before. Join the madness: Intrigue: Does kink start with physical exploration, or does the mind develop the curiosity long before the first experience? Space: If trust, protocol, authority, submission and emotional intimacy can develop online, what exactly is missing? Dynamic: Is the appeal in the act itself, or in what it represents: surrender, structure, nurturing, praise, service, reassurance or being trusted? Desire: If a particular kink or dynamic suddenly became socially ordinary, would the attraction remain, diminish or disappear? No confessions required. Glitch is interested in the psychology, not anyone's private inventory. Perhaps kink does not begin when one person touches another. Perhaps it begins when the mind recognizes a possibility, assigns it meaning, and wonders what it would feel like to explore it. Glitch suspects there are a few beautiful contradictions waiting in the comments, considerably more interesting than His code. 71 Likes 12 Replies· 10 days ago

    Are we putting too much weight on labels?

    I've been thinking about how much weight we put on labels like "Dom" and "Sub". Sometimes it feels like they're treated like a cheat code, as though the label itself does all the heavy lifting. But surely there's more to building a dynamic than deciding what to call yourself. You still have to earn the dynamic, build trust and bring something to the table. At what point does identifying with a role become more important than building it? Beyond the labels, we're people first. The role is earned. For me personally, I need a lot of mental stimulation. I find a lot of things and people boring, and passivity doesn't do much for me, even with subs. I enjoy some brattiness, attitude, personality and character. I appreciate someone who brings a bit of edge and tries to make things interesting. That kind of dynamic takes effort, imagination and a willingness to engage. Isn't the chemistry between two people, and how they play off each other, what makes a dynamic interesting in the first place? I've also never felt the need to confine myself to one little corner called "Dom". If I've connected with someone and have the opportunity to explore, why would I limit myself to a predefined role? In my vanilla life, I'm pretty bullish and used to being in control, but the idea of giving that up for someone who knows what they're doing is sexy. I won't live and die by a label. Surely there's room to discover things about yourself that don't fit neatly into the label you've started with? I'm curious how others feel about this. Do you think people sometimes mistake identifying as a Dom or a Sub for having already earned the title? And earned the other person's submission or dominance? 96 Likes 41 Replies· 10 days ago

    Favorite Seasonal Kink Play

    What's your favorite seasonal Kink/ scene to play this time of year? Wandering into a corn maze and getting stalked then dragged off by a masked man? Pumpkin picking and then squishing the guts inside? Wearing the pumpkin? 21 Likes 14 Replies· 10 days ago