BWC qualifications

[jo****]

4 hours ago, NineInchNailsYou said:

Id say over the national average, so in the UK that 6.5"
I dont think everyone realises you can put those measurements on profile (also, some men lie)

They actually added that this year. When I signed up that wasn’t an option. Also, “width” is stupid. Circumference would be a better measure

[Ch****]

4 hours ago, DACJ815 said:

I’m 10” and I consider that BWC. Anything 9”+ I think you could consider BWC or soda can girth guys.

that definitely makes sense

[Bi****]

You wouldn't advertise in your user name but would most likely brag about it in your profile and that's coming from a well Endowed man at 9 inches long and 4 inches around thanks

[Bi****]

But I'm a show off LMAO

[Ch****]

2 hours ago, BigFatLong said:

You wouldn't advertise in your user name but would most likely brag about it in your profile and that's coming from a well Endowed man at 9 inches long and 4 inches around thanks

that makes more sense

[un****]

5.5 is average so i’d say probably 7 or so is where most people would start to consider that as BWC as for why eh people are weird i have it filled out but could honestly delete it and it’d have no impact because no one reads these anyways

[Ch****]

4 minutes ago, undeaddom said:

5.5 is average so i’d say probably 7 or so is where most people would start to consider that as BWC as for why eh people are weird i have it filled out but could honestly delete it and it’d have no impact because no one reads these anyways

i think women read them more than men but I can really only speak for myself. and speaking for myself when i read sizes it’s absolutely intriguing and can be a turn on or off depending on what’s out there. It’s also not an ultimate deciding factor but it helps if that make sense

[Mr****]

I would consider 9 or over to be BWC

[mr****]

4 minutes ago, ChocBabyGirl said:

i think women read them more than men but I can really only speak for myself. and speaking for myself when i read sizes it’s absolutely intriguing and can be a turn on or off depending on what’s out there. It’s also not an ultimate deciding factor but it helps if that make sense

I don’t think women read them often either but I think that’s mainly because they have dick pick fatigue 😂

[Ch****]

3 minutes ago, mrwindell said:

I don’t think women read them often either but I think that’s mainly because they have dick pick fatigue 😂

Highly possible 🤣

[mr****]

11 hours ago, ChocBabyGirl said:

Idk you tell me ? That’s what my question is

He’s lost and talking about how tall he is

[si****]

It's ok to fantasize having a 10" to be attracted to. And play with. That's why Women get bigger and bigger dildos. Perfectly fine. Enjoy what's in front of you. There's a lot to enjoy without focusing on size. Your partner will pleasure you no matter your size, shape, etc. Enjoy each other

[un****]

3 hours ago, ChocBabyGirl said:

i think women read them more than men but I can really only speak for myself. and speaking for myself when i read sizes it’s absolutely intriguing and can be a turn on or off depending on what’s out there. It’s also not an ultimate deciding factor but it helps if that make sense

i believe you may very well be in the minority the majority of individuals i’ve spoken to never read any of it not even the bio which tbh i can understand not reading the stats but you should at least read the bio but anyways unless you’ve got a preferred height there isn’t much you can put in stats that won’t just be shown in the pictures height is like the one thing that is hard to determine from pics

[Fi****]

Whats the question??

[Ch****]

2 hours ago, undeaddom said:

i believe you may very well be in the minority the majority of individuals i’ve spoken to never read any of it not even the bio which tbh i can understand not reading the stats but you should at least read the bio but anyways unless you’ve got a preferred height there isn’t much you can put in stats that won’t just be shown in the pictures height is like the one thing that is hard to determine from pics

I don’t totally agree as far as what information is and isn’t useful in stats. For instance: relationship status, body hair, and
orientation definitely are important factors for me. If a person is fully clothed in their profiles pics or it’s blank then you wouldn’t necessarily know these things. But to some zodiac signs and disabilities may be importantly as well. I think the stats are just as important as the profile in the digital age.

[me****]

Men love to pump up their egos... usually not a good sign

[mr****]

I think a huge factor not mentioned yet is most of the time women are responding to msgs and not even given the opportunity to search

[Bu****]

17.5 cm is almost 7 inches

[Ca****]

I’d say 8 inches plus qualifies as a bwc but 7 1/2 inches, stays hard long, has superb tongue skills, can hold a conversation and sense of humor I’ve been told is just fine.