Jump to content

BWC qualifications


Recommended Posts

12 hours ago, Firmnasty said:

So you have a global stat and asking men what constitutes a bwc? Its like looking at filtered piic of women and wondering if you even look like that. The question was never looking for a real answer..just trying to stir up the pot which you did. Good for you. The real question is how badly do you need a bwc?

Men like this are why women dont trust or feel safe around men.... grow up and be respectful

Wednesday at 06:03 PM, Toxic_Meerkat said:

But that's not accurate. The global average is 5.1 to 5.5". Ethnic group changes it up as does geography. The average in the USA is 5.1, Australia is 5.5. Ecuador tops the list at 6.9" on average(!). There are fetish groups on fetlife and Kik that set the minimum for BWC status at 7" (I guess saying that it must be above average to qualify).
I'm just a stickler for accuracy and statistics! 🤣

Agreed. These are the best commonly accepted stats. Measurement qualification and technique matter. Many men lie or misconstrue for a variety of purposes, including there is so much pressure to "not be small" or to have a BWC or BBC. There are some groups on fetlife for verified measurements... I believe there are very few at a true 8, then much less at 9, and no verified 10" or above. Just a huge point of reference compared to what is stated. Personally, I'm glad I'm not even bigger. I've had a few partners that could barely take it and it would have been either impossible or uncomfortable in a very bad way. Different anatomy combinations for different people.

Coming after you? Show respect? You invite this conversation to happen with your ridiculous posts and accuse me of a small dick as a result of it?? You're pathetic and pety. Enjoy your miserable life.

×
×
  • Create New...