Privacy Vs True D/S

[DaisyMae]

I understand the need for privacy... believe me. But if you don't trust me enough to see your face pic, don't expect a meet up. Don't expect online play. Don't expect my submission. D/S is about trust - and if you don't trust me then it's a hard no!!

I understand fooling around kinkily with someone while maintaining privacy, it isn't for me but I get it. But D/S is a lifestyle based on trust and communication. It is not D/S if there is no trust. 

[Briandmills]

Well said

[Deleted Member]

Respect

[BeardedSi]

Well said... no trust... equals no dynamic

[Ergie]

Can not agree more

[Liber8ed]

So a face is to be trusted ? Irrespective wether you have experienced the individual . I think not but your sentiment takes a long time to happen when talking trust . 

[DaisyMae]

7 minutes ago, Liber8ed said:

So a face is to be trusted ? Irrespective wether you have experienced the individual . I think not but your sentiment takes a long time to happen when talking trust . 

I think you're completely missing the point

[Ergie]

It has to be starting point, of course trust not gained by seeing the face only. However when we meet new people in real life for ever purpose it can be , we look at facial expressions, eyes. It's natural human instinct. Trust it's self and especially in BDSM sub culture it's a very sensitive topic. 

Edited November 9, 2019 by Ergie
Grammar

[DaisyMae]

Absolutely. I'm in no way saying that I suddenly trust someone because I've seen their face. But I certainly do NOT trust them if they are unwilling to show their face. 

[Jaybaybay]

Good for you! I am the same way. I give too much to my mistress to be anything less than firm in deciding the who's or how's, and I am sure you do too. There seems to be a myth in our community among some that a sub should be a sub from the second they message, a true dom, one worth serving, doesn't have to *** themselves on you they respect you and value what it means that you are willing. Good for you cheers!