Website Logo

Handling Privacy and Openness in Kink Relationships

Handling different levels of openness in kink relationships can be a challenging dynamic; what we share with the world, where we share it, and with whom. As a self-producing performer and writer, Cameryn Moore is very open about her sex life, and over the past eight years, Cameryn's partners have all had varying degrees of openness for different reasons. But, what questions do you need to ask? Cameryn shares her experiences. 

 

First of all, remember there is no value or merit inherent in outness. That being said, I’ve always been a super-loudmouth activist about things, especially in regions where the surrounding culture is conservative, but there are many legitimate reasons why someone may not be open in public spaces about being a kinkster. Places of employment, for example, can be bad environments for “too much sharing”; ditto if you are in any domestic dispute involving child custody.

Conversely, there are also good reasons for openness, and partners who are more private should still make an effort to understand how keeping one’s private life under wraps can feel supremely disorienting and uncomfortable to someone who lives life more out on the table. Furthermore, the more open person in this situation might end up feeling like you’re trying to keep them and your relationship a secret. How can you resolve these seeming conflicts? What questions do you need to ask? 
 

Sharing private information 

Let’s start with what information goes out where. This is especially a concern if either of you ever post stuff about your personal sex life on mainstream social media. I frequently have drawn from real-life stories for my blog posts, for example, never mind passing references to things on Facebook.

Some things to discuss: How do you refer to your partners in social media, if at all? (Some of my lovers have gotten nicknames, which I let them agree to.) Do you tag them in a post? (Some of mine yes, others no.) Is your relationship status acknowledged by an official link, or is it “complicated”? (I have decided to leave my current status “complicated.”) Until you have a good sense of what your partner is comfortable with, it’s a good idea to run your posts and status updates by them if you refer to them in it.

This same initial caution applies to pictures as well. Would you want to put pictures up on Facebook? On FetLife? Here on fetish.com? Under what conditions? With mask? Not showing bits or only showing bits? 

CBT and BDSM (3)-min.jpg


If you have doubts about privacy levels in your kink relationships, talk about it.


Who do you tell?

My kink is an essential part of my relationship; my closest friends know this. I also run a dirty storytelling show featuring real-life first-person sex stories, which means that I have to be ready to spill. I check with my partner: what I can put out in the world about us?

Once you’re off the internet, there are public, “meat-space” appearances. How do you dress when you’re out on the town? Do you wear a collar or not? What kind of collar? I have a bracelet that I always wear, but it’s nothing that would stand out as particularly kink-affiliated. I suspect that if I were to wear a “daddy’s little girl” t-shirt out in public, my partner might be uncomfortable. 
 

How do you talk with each other out in public?

If you have specific power-dynamic related terms of address or endearments for each other, where do you employ those? My partner’s actual name is my safe word; I use it to get his attention so seldom that it’s a notable, action-stopping event when I do. I call him by a different name all the rest of the time, except when people are around; in joyful situations, like greeting at the airport after one of our many long separations, it requires a real effort of will, not to squeal his “play” name across the terminal. I’ve learned to control myself, and in exchange, he has gotten more relaxed about soft mentions in the grocery store.

Everyone’s situation is different, which is why nothing beats discussion for dealing with these questions. Compromise will be necessary, as the more out one learns to curb their impulses and the more reserved/private partner learns to sit with the nerves that can come up when they’re stretching outside their comfort zone.

The most important thing is to take your partner’s concerns seriously and assume good will about each other’s feelings. You both want to bridge this gap, and that is the best starting point.


Liked Cameryn's article? How do you handle privacy and openness in your kink relationships? Sign up for free and kick-off a discussion on Fetish.com 

 

Magazine Banner - Join Now [Fetish.com] (1)-min.jpg

 

 

 

Comment

Comments


    Related Discussions

    Related Discussions

    KINK: THE FORBIDDEN FRUIT

    The psychology and Glitchcore Would kink still be desirable if it were no longer forbidden? Does one desire something because it genuinely appeals to them, or does knowing it is forbidden make it more appealing? Consider taboo. The act itself may be ordinary. Introduce a restriction, attach a consequence, surround it with secrecy, and suddenly it acquires a different psychological weight. Within the lifestyle (BDSMk), it becomes rather interesting. Before the body, there is the mind. Kink does not necessarily begin with physical contact. It can begin with curiosity, imagination, anticipation and the meaning one attaches to an experience. A Dominant establishes a protocol. A submissive chooses to follow it. A Caregiver offers structure and reassurance. A Little finds comfort in a chosen headspace, familiar routines, praise or playful rules. Even online, two people can develop rituals, expectations, boundaries and an exchange of power. There may be no physical collar, yet its symbolism can carry meaning. No hand holding the leash, yet the anticipation of "await further instructions" can be tantalizing. Physical intimacy does add a dimensional element, but it does not create the psychological foundation. The psychology of temptation Psychologists call one relevant mechanism psychological reactance. When people feel their freedom of choice is being restricted, the restricted option can become more attractive. Trying to suppress a thought can also make it more persistent. But this does not mean prohibition creates a kink. It may intensify an existing curiosity, give it a narrative or make it more difficult to ignore. Perhaps the same question applies to power exchange. Is a submissive drawn to obedience itself, or to the trust and respect behind it? Does a little enjoy the rule, or the reassurance of having a Caregiver who provides structure? Does a Dominant find satisfaction in bringing structure, or in being trusted with the responsibility that comes with authority? And sometimes, the attraction is simply to the fantasy. Remove the anticipation, and the experience may lose its appeal. A negotiated limit is not an invitation to push. A safeword is not disobedience. Submission remains a choice. Glitch's observation' Perhaps the forbidden fruit does not always change its flavour. Perhaps it changes the mind of the one looking at it. An online dynamic can be meaningful without physical contact. A protocol is more than a list of instructions. A command is more than a sentence. A Caregiver is more than someone who establishes rules. Their significance comes from the understanding between the people who create that dynamic. Glitch suspects that the body is sometimes given too much credit for a conversation the mind started long before. Join the madness: Intrigue: Does kink start with physical exploration, or does the mind develop the curiosity long before the first experience? Space: If trust, protocol, authority, submission and emotional intimacy can develop online, what exactly is missing? Dynamic: Is the appeal in the act itself, or in what it represents: surrender, structure, nurturing, praise, service, reassurance or being trusted? Desire: If a particular kink or dynamic suddenly became socially ordinary, would the attraction remain, diminish or disappear? No confessions required. Glitch is interested in the psychology, not anyone's private inventory. Perhaps kink does not begin when one person touches another. Perhaps it begins when the mind recognizes a possibility, assigns it meaning, and wonders what it would feel like to explore it. Glitch suspects there are a few beautiful contradictions waiting in the comments, considerably more interesting than His code. 67 Likes 12 Replies· 2 days ago

    Comunidade kink RS

    Oi, pessoal alguém é do Rio grande do Sul? Sinto que a comunidade gaúcha não tem uma organização tao presente aqui no Sul? O que acham a respeito. Ps: aberto a conversa e interagir com colegas 1 Like 2 Replies· 5 days ago

    Favorite Seasonal Kink Play

    What's your favorite seasonal Kink/ scene to play this time of year? Wandering into a corn maze and getting stalked then dragged off by a masked man? Pumpkin picking and then squishing the guts inside? Wearing the pumpkin? 21 Likes 14 Replies· 2 days ago

    Voice Kink

    I am curious to know if any of you have voice kink. I really get excited when I hear that voice. The excitement is too much compared to no voice chat. Anyone else experience it 56 Likes 31 Replies· 9 days ago

    What kink is huge for everyone else but just "fine" for you?

    No shaming anyone's thing here, everyone's kink is valid!!!!!! This is about the ones that are clearly massive, whole communities built on them, and for you they're just... fine. Mine is feet. Nothing against them, tried it, enjoyable enough. But there's a whole universe of people for whom feet are THE thing, and I've never felt whatever that is. The gap between "sure, that's nice" and "this is my entire fetish" is what I don't get. What's yours? Bonus points if the thing that's just fine for you is something someone above you swears by. 44 Likes 44 Replies· 8 days ago