RedFoxUK Posted July 30 7 hours ago, Reybee said: If my Daddy can’t take care of all my needs—even the financial ones—then I might as well just have a normal relationship with someone basic. I think we’re forgetting how precious it is to have the privilege of being in a DDLG relationship. In order for me to enter subspace, feel carefree, and truly safe, I need all my bases covered: emotional, financial, and mental. Only then can I fully let go, be dominated, and learn from Daddy how to take care of him. You can’t have one without the oooother 🎶 Thats also not to say I can’t take care of myself financially-but to me it’s a privilege to see my raw innocence and so being well taken care of in ALL ways wouldn’t upset the perfect daddy for me. I'm afraid you appear to have a fundamental misunderstanding of the difference between DDLG and a Sugar Daddy/Baby girl relationship. Your argument that a Daddy should pay for the privilege of your submission or your 'raw innocence' is proof of that. Research is as simple as a Google search.
Co**** Posted August 22 I can pay my own bills, but a Daddy is a protector, caregiver, nurturer, and a PROVIDER. Isn’t that kind of the point? Daddies take care of their little girls. I can handle my own way, but if I can’t, I expect my Daddy to—and yes, I’ll make sure to please him for it later.
RedFoxUK Posted August 22 4 hours ago, CocoNutti_69 said: I can pay my own bills, but a Daddy is a protector, caregiver, nurturer, and a PROVIDER. Isn’t that kind of the point? Daddies take care of their little girls. I can handle my own way, but if I can’t, I expect my Daddy to—and yes, I’ll make sure to please him for it later. Lord knows I've said many times on these forums that kink, BDSM, DDLG, etc can mean different things to different people... but if your Daddy has to essentially 'pay to play' doesn't that make you the more dominant one? And thereby change the whole dynamic as a result?
Ro**** Posted August 22 4 hours ago, RedFoxUK said: Lord knows I've said many times on these forums that kink, BDSM, DDLG, etc can mean different things to different people... but if your Daddy has to essentially 'pay to play' doesn't that make you the more dominant one? And thereby change the whole dynamic as a result? It depends on your perspective. Some will see it as "pay to play," and others will see it as making sure they are taken care of and happy. It's also between the two persons involved to decide, not general public. I'm solo poly for the independance and autonomy, and I do pay my own bills and such. I do have a daddy dom that insists on treating me and gets upset if I don't ask for asisst when I am in the occasional tight spot *** wise. It is hard for me to ask as I am deeply independent after raising three ***agers on my own.
RedFoxUK Posted August 22 33 minutes ago, RogueLynx said: It depends on your perspective. Some will see it as "pay to play," and others will see it as making sure they are taken care of and happy. It's also between the two persons involved to decide, not general public. I'm solo poly for the independance and autonomy, and I do pay my own bills and such. I do have a daddy dom that insists on treating me and gets upset if I don't ask for asisst when I am in the occasional tight spot *** wise. It is hard for me to ask as I am deeply independent after raising three ***agers on my own. And there in is the important difference... between your Dom/Daddy offering and indeed wanting to support you and help you (which I completley agree with), and the previous poster who would EXPECT it. It's the expectation or demand that I find questionable.
Recommended Posts