🤦🏻 It’s a REAL Question. What is hung? Or considered above average?

[Wi****]

Friday at 06:08 AM, QueenLatinaBbw said:

Every heard of the pop or soda called 7up.. Ideally that’s the good size. 👌🏼

Is that the 6 ounce or the 32 ounce bottle?

[ol****]

50 minutes ago, Windwolf said:

4000 men are hardly sufficient data to represent approximately 4.5 billion men on the planet . And unfortunately, it's not like doctors don't make false claims every day.
Data is one thing, but reliable data is another thing all together.

The results I was referring to was a study conducted on males that self reported their size from a group of 4000 males. However the studies that have actually been conducted all together is 75 studies across multiple different countries, which includes a total of 52k males compared.

Thankfully the large sample size allows for a more accurate value that is closer to the theoretical value of the true value, as with this large value the mean value will be closer to a normal distribution (bell curve), which is similar regardless of the population of the sample; meaning you stating there are 4,5 billion men would still theoretically be within this distribution range, so the sample size doesn’t matter because 52k is a relatively large sample size

The estimation of the mean of these values gives a great indication of the true broader size regardless of the total male population, and given the large population 52k the standard error of the mean (SEM) would be extremely small, along with a narrow confidence interval, which means these results could apply to a large majority of the population say 98% - statistics allow one to work out the possible true value based on numbers, which usually means in is in fact closer to the real viable than one may think.

This mean value of course is the only best estimate of a true global value, however the mean and SD values allow for a more accurate true theoretical value; and although you mention bias, those are likely lowered by the diversity of the results gathered through multiple countries and so this is statistically the most best possible approximation- but just because it’s an approximation doesn’t necessarily mean the value doesn’t hold true for a large majority of the populous.

Although as you stated doctors can make false claims, however they use a standardised method for telling, and so this can likely be controlled for in this manner. The data obtained obviously has been ***r reviewed also, so your point about there not being sufficient data compared to 4.5 billion males doesn’t hold true, as statistical analysis allows one to make up the difference.

It’s like saying you no longer believe in the statistical significance of research that says “99.9% confidence rate in amount of bacteria killed within use of a product” these numbers aren’t just magically generated, they hold statistical accuracy and precision regardless of doctors bias

[ol****]

4 hours ago, TabooTommy said:

As anticipated. Almost everyone missed the assignment. Although bravo for the lack of jokes I expected. But I asked and explained very specifically that no one cares how big you are, or what you may like. And I absolutely don’t care about math or studies or surveys. And no one asked about dick size compared to value to a partner discussions. Or the definition of the word hung. This was basically a waste of time unless the expirement was will people always put personality before principle. I feel like this is why people should have to answer a short quiz about someone’s bio before being able to message so as to ensure they read it and understand.

The question was simply in your own opinion: what do you consider to be hung. No science, no preferences, just what size penis would prompt you when looking at a person to say to yourself…. That person is “hung”
Anyway. I appreciate the participation regardless. Not all questions in life get answered. Part of the mystery

Apologies seems we all missed the point in the post, and instead got a little carried away. Although I think that’s because the disparity in those who think it does matter has been increasing, in general people are finding they feel less comfortable in their own skin and desire something more.

It’s a funny subject, as I wonder, did the romans care about their penis size, which the majority at the time i believe had smaller sizes and those were seemingly desirable?

It’s interesting to think about has society has gravitated towards bigger, even though in general the average size is decreasing along with sperm count - although both probably have no correlation.

Your body is what it is, well until we have stem cell implantation for cosmetic purposes, and a better way to mitigate regression once the cells begin to die. So for now, your stuck with what you have, and if someone doesn’t think that’s enough, tuff titty let them go, - although I bet a lot of men will likely chose SEx robots for the very feeling they feel inadequate.

[Wi****]

2 hours ago, oliver6996 said:

The results I was referring to was a study conducted on males that self reported their size from a group of 4000 males. However the studies that have actually been conducted all together is 75 studies across multiple different countries, which includes a total of 52k males compared.

Thankfully the large sample size allows for a more accurate value that is closer to the theoretical value of the true value, as with this large value the mean value will be closer to a normal distribution (bell curve), which is similar regardless of the population of the sample; meaning you stating there are 4,5 billion men would still theoretically be within this distribution range, so the sample size doesn’t matter because 52k is a relatively large sample size

The estimation of the mean of these values gives a great indication of the true broader size regardless of the total male population, and given the large population 52k the standard error of the mean (SEM) would be extremely small, along with a narrow confidence interval, which means these results could apply to a large majority of the population say 98% - statistics allow one to work out the possible true value based on numbers, which usually means in is in fact closer to the real viable than one may think.

This mean value of course is the only best estimate of a true global value, however the mean and SD values allow for a more accurate true theoretical value; and although you mention bias, those are likely lowered by the diversity of the results gathered through multiple countries and so this is statistically the most best possible approximation- but just because it’s an approximation doesn’t necessarily mean the value doesn’t hold true for a large majority of the populous.

Although as you stated doctors can make false claims, however they use a standardised method for telling, and so this can likely be controlled for in this manner. The data obtained obviously has been ***r reviewed also, so your point about there not being sufficient data compared to 4.5 billion males doesn’t hold true, as statistical analysis allows one to make up the difference.

It’s like saying you no longer believe in the statistical significance of research that says “99.9% confidence rate in amount of bacteria killed within use of a product” these numbers aren’t just magically generated, they hold statistical accuracy and precision regardless of doctors bias

Theoretical, something believed but not yet proven.
The only thing proven about a theory ,is that it's a presumption that has not been proven. Please don't confuse that with facts.

[sl****]

tangential question, what is the proper way to measure? Are we going from balls to tip on the underside or from tip to tummy on top?

[Th****]

How is there no such thing as a median measurement for penile length?

[ol****]

9 hours ago, Windwolf said:

4000 men are hardly sufficient data to represent approximately 4.5 billion men on the planet . And unfortunately, it's not like doctors don't make false claims every day.
Data is one thing, but reliable data is another thing all together.

I understand what your trying to get at, but just because your using mathematics to estimate, doesn’t mean the results aren’t factual.

It’s a fact that 52k provides the most accurate estimate of mean penis size currently available.

And based on mathematical theory said statistical inference has an extremely low standard mean error, and confidence rates.

The results are a scientifically validated conclusion that said values can be applied to a larger population.

As did you saying about theory means believe not proven, your right, however to discredit the mathematical interpretation would be a bit naive. Most scientific understanding of the universe comes from mathematical inference and interpretation, Einstein’s did so with black holes, and those were proven to exist.

Most studies you see are based on this type of evidence, are you saying that all studies are pointless then? - no because that’s not the case, using mathematical principles and theory you can establish a link towards a value that is close to the truth, even if said value isn’t exact, according to mathematical reasoning its a close you will get.

The idea you can ever truly test a whole population of 4.5 billion people is a fallacy, it ignores how statistics work, - we don’t need to test every water molecule present in water to understand that statistically the results conclude it evaporates into at gas at 100°C or that mean bond enthalpies always fall within a particular range for every molecule.

[Wi****]

4 hours ago, oliver6996 said:

I understand what your trying to get at, but just because your using mathematics to estimate, doesn’t mean the results aren’t factual.

It’s a fact that 52k provides the most accurate estimate of mean penis size currently available.

And based on mathematical theory said statistical inference has an extremely low standard mean error, and confidence rates.

The results are a scientifically validated conclusion that said values can be applied to a larger population.

As did you saying about theory means believe not proven, your right, however to discredit the mathematical interpretation would be a bit naive. Most scientific understanding of the universe comes from mathematical inference and interpretation, Einstein’s did so with black holes, and those were proven to exist.

Most studies you see are based on this type of evidence, are you saying that all studies are pointless then? - no because that’s not the case, using mathematical principles and theory you can establish a link towards a value that is close to the truth, even if said value isn’t exact, according to mathematical reasoning its a close you will get.

The idea you can ever truly test a whole population of 4.5 billion people is a fallacy, it ignores how statistics work, - we don’t need to test every water molecule present in water to understand that statistically the results conclude it evaporates into at gas at 100°C or that mean bond enthalpies always fall within a particular range for every molecule.

I see, you mean like the scientific mathematical conclusion that the earth was flat?
Sorry, but the laws of physics are not laws, they are just laws as we know them.

I'm not sure why you feel the need to prove mathematically what hasn't been proven.

Mathematics isn't what the post was about.
So to to answer the question asked by TabooTommy.
If you feel hung,you are.

[ol****]

8 hours ago, Windwolf said:

I see, you mean like the scientific mathematical conclusion that the earth was flat?
Sorry, but the laws of physics are not laws, they are just laws as we know them.

I'm not sure why you feel the need to prove mathematically what hasn't been proven.

Mathematics isn't what the post was about.
So to to answer the question asked by TabooTommy.
If you feel hung,you are.

Alright just forget about it

[Deleted Member]

My friend, you just started a dick swinging contest, lol!

[ol****]

3 hours ago, anonymr617 said:

My friend, you just started a dick swinging contest, lol!

Well that hasn’t happened yet haha

[LexiD]

The average female is only about 6-6.5" deep, if that helps

[Qu****]

Yesterday at 07:01 AM, oliver6996 said:

Well that hasn’t happened yet haha

I’ll be a judge 👩‍⚖️ lol

[Kr****]

On 6/6/2025 at 1:25 PM, eyemblacksheep said:

Porn has a lot of cheating - so never compare to that - everything from cocksleaves to pumping full of substances to make things temporarily bigger

As well as the camera angle... It also looks larger with low body fat.

@topic I would say you are hung, if you have to be carefull not to not hurt her.

Edited June 14 by Krateros

[ol****]

13 hours ago, LexiD said:

The average female is only about 6-6.5" deep, if that helps

That’s an interesting, but I know no guy will remind her of this

[Ma****]

r/bigdickproblems should help you out

[Ma****]

And anything over 7" bpe is big