Jump to content

Lust,


Recommended Posts

the actual evil of the word, is the absence of shared experience.
Lust is evil when you don't listen to their safe word, you don't stop when they say "stop" or "I don't want to right now" or "I'm tired".

Lust is evil when you *** yourself on someone, when you don't care about them getting hurt. When you don't care of consent. Consent is everything.

When I've loved someone so deeply, and her and I really got into it. We would bruise each other. Is that wrong?

I know 100% she wanted me too. I've loved her for 20 months and l've never loved anyone better. I've struggled so much like you, now this struggle is my desire to be so rough with someone, but it sends me like no one's business when she wants me to be rough.

it would be wrong to be here if you had a relationship and they wouldn't want you talking up other people so sensually
isn't that cheating?
isn't that lust?

I didn’t but I do now
What it sounds like is consent ***s. When you don't stop at a safe word that is a consent ***. All consent ***s are centered around selfishness. It is total disregard for your partners safety and security. Let's just say lust destroys the dynamic that you're trying to build. Lust is a betrayal of honesty respect responsibility trust, and honor. If you find yourself lusting for somebody else, it is time to reconsider your dynamic.
🙄 That is NOT lust! That’s a total lack of respect, experience, discipline, and accountability!
Evil would be a self proclaimed Dom with narcissistic behavior, zero emotional maturity, no attention to detail, and aggressive tendencies, taking advantage of a sub’s trust, openness, and loyalty.
Its disgusting!
Furthermore, that kind of behavior can easily land someone in jail…
Lust is simply a strong sexual desire or craving. Like most human traits, evil people can use this to take advantage of others or justify their own bad behavior.
Pick up a dictionary before you use words that don't actually pertain to what your speaking about???? Lust is hormones.. your talking about a borderline S&M relationship bordering *** fantasy... Perhaps you need to chill the fuck out and reassess what it is you think you want from life before moving forward.. and if you come to the same conclusion without trying then you go and find like minded individuals.
Except for @toughteddybear (and even he only tapped into one aspect of it), it seems many don't know what lust is. Lust is a desire so strong it's almost overpowering. You can lust for people, sexual scenarios, ***, power, fame.. Lust is a hunger for something and it is "biblically" wrong when it is exercised or sought to be fulfilled outside of "biblical" legalities. e.g. sex outside of marriage or becoming a leader just for the self satisfaction of control.

What you are speaking of pertains to a type of lust and somebody fulfilling their lust without the consent of the person or situation they are using to fulfill it. In this case that is "***". If I am married and my wife and I are making love and she (knowing I am heterosexual and not turned on by ass play) suddenly jabs a dildo up my ass while we are fucking. That's ***.

They way your post is written actually leaves huge curiosity to who violated consent. Her or you?

If the two of you are in a committed relationship and one of you is talking to somebody else beyond the lines of friendship into the realm of the fulfillment of lusts -even if it's just words- yes that is cheating. While the body may not be committing the physical act of cheating the heart is.
The last two starred out words in my comment are the word r*ape without the star.
umm I'm saying Lust isn't good. Biblical lust. Can I get anyone some water? I thought this was a safe space
29 minutes ago, archangelswan said:
umm I'm saying Lust isn't good. Biblical lust. Can I get anyone some water? I thought this was a safe space

If any of your left comment is directed in any way -whether fully or partially- at me, then let me first apologize for wording anything so that the end result sounds as some form of cut to you. My intentions are not to demean or attack. I was simply developing perspective in order to get my response a context that it could be held against. If the definition of lust were not specified in some form then the answers or opinions related to your post could go off in any direction or angle based upon the responders perspective. In response to your last comment, yes I believe that would be a correct assessment. Lust is not good. To specify that belief, I think lust only becomes "lust" when it exceeds the boundaries of desire into something much more unhealthy.

"last" comment not "left"
No water, thanks… I’ll take a whiskey 🥃 on the rocks, thanks! 😉
4 hours ago, DannyGalaxies said:

If any of your left comment is directed in any way -whether fully or partially- at me, then let me first apologize for wording anything so that the end result sounds as some form of cut to you. My intentions are not to demean or attack. I was simply developing perspective in order to get my response a context that it could be held against. If the definition of lust were not specified in some form then the answers or opinions related to your post could go off in any direction or angle based upon the responders perspective. In response to your last comment, yes I believe that would be a correct assessment. Lust is not good. To specify that belief, I think lust only becomes "lust" when it exceeds the boundaries of desire into something much more unhealthy.

no my comment was not against you, thank you

×
×
  • Create New...