How does your BDSM identity show up in everyday, non-kinky decisions?

[thefootslut]

I’ve been thinking about how BDSM isn’t always something we do—sometimes it’s something we are, even when there’s no scene, no protocol, and no sexual context at all. 

For example, does being dominant or submissive influence how you make decisions at work or in relationships? Are there moments where your BDSM identity quietly supports you—like confidence, calm, structure, or self-awareness—without anyone else ever noticing?

I’m not talking about acting out a dynamic in public or crossing consent lines—more about internal habits, values, or instincts that seem shaped by your kink identity. I’m curious whether others experience this as well, or if you prefer to keep your BDSM self completely compartmentalized. Has it evolved over time for you?

Looking forward to hearing different perspectives—Doms, subs, switches, lifestyle folks, and casual players alike.

[Stepfubk4]

It absolutely is a part of who I am,personality wise, both in and out of the bedroom.

[to****]

You’ll have to bare with me on that one darling, either that or it’s going to be a short answer

[ey****]

there's stuff which crosses over - but then this is stuff where it's not my BDSM idendity showing up in vanilla - or my vanilla idendity which shows up in BDSM

it's my idendity

I guess, of course, there's stuff we may apply from learning.  But, like I tend to reject the idea of "I do this in a vanilla setting cos I am sub/Dom/have-this-fetish" in a kink setting

 

[Do****]

It possibly coincides with a stage in life when I, like many women, am more confident in myself and my equality to others. More confident to challenge a man who talks down to me, is patronising or condescending. And when I find myself doing that, I notice the alignment with my D:s play. Looking back I was probably always fairly confident around men. But even more happy to call them out now, whereas previously if dismissed or belittled I wouldn’t have challenged it.

[Ba****]

For the most part it doesn't. I wouldn't say it's compartmentalized because it's something like hair or eye color. It always is what it is. That being said it doesn't always need to be primarily expressed or front and center, just like any other part of me, depending on the situation, doesn't need to be..

[Wh****]

I would say yes for me. I hold myself with confidence and in control of most situations I’m in. Even if internally I’m freaking out over whatever’s happening. The other side of it for me is the caretaker. This I exhibit through out my day. From helping someone cross the road, opening a door for someone, or being present for someone emotionally.

[thefootslut]

Great replies so far, wide range of views as well 👍

[subjoe101]

In the beginning, there was no crossover, but over the years, as my submission matured and my wife has trained me, my submission has become a part of every day life. I find that I am always looking for ways to support and uplift women. It has become natural for me to yield to women in general, so long as it is appropriate and they are respectful.

[Do****]

7 hours ago, subjoe101 said:

In the beginning, there was no crossover, but over the years, as my submission matured and my wife has trained me, my submission has become a part of every day life. I find that I am always looking for ways to support and uplift women. It has become natural for me to yield to women in general, so long as it is appropriate and they are respectful.

Reading subs saying things like that is beautiful, and made me wonder why? Because my experience in my marriage was with a man who didn’t want to support or uplift me, or even spend time with me. So I value the interaction with subs who actually want to do that. I wonder how many women become Dommes because of bad experiences with men. I know if I’m with a sub then they will value and support me, and that dynamic can be depended upon. With a non-sub man it feels like a gamble and more likely than not I’ll be with someone who doesn’t support and uplift women, or give a damn about me, once the “honeymoon period” is over with. That’s a sad state of affairs.

But I love that you do that in life subjoe, and all the other subs!

[pu****]

21 hours ago, DommeDelight said:

Reading subs saying things like that is beautiful, and made me wonder why? Because my experience in my marriage was with a man who didn’t want to support or uplift me, or even spend time with me. So I value the interaction with subs who actually want to do that. I wonder how many women become Dommes because of bad experiences with men. I know if I’m with a sub then they will value and support me, and that dynamic can be depended upon. With a non-sub man it feels like a gamble and more likely than not I’ll be with someone who doesn’t support and uplift women, or give a damn about me, once the “honeymoon period” is over with. That’s a sad state of affairs.

But I love that you do that in life subjoe, and all the other subs!

I really like how you describe the dynamic with a sub is safer than a vanilla relationship with a man. I feel like it works in reverse, as well. As a sub, the idea of being in a healthy D/s dynamic feels safer bc my Dom will always have my best interests at heart and be attuned to me in a way most “normal” partners are oblivious to. The hard part is that finding (available) Doms who understand the true meaning of the role and practice with care and careful control. Tragically, the “50 Shades Frauds” are way more prevalent these days.

[ey****]

I guess somewhat contradictory to my first comment (though, actually not) I think sometimes folk come into kink spaces and there is a lot of opportunities for learning, and they may apply that learning elsewhere.

There's a Domme I can think of who posts "slave tasks" and it's stuff like - contribute more to the housework, do something nice for your wife, stay hydrated, etc.  

And I think that can sometimes rub off onto people.  I guess being able to live our best kink lives often involves making improvements outside of it.