Live Video sites

[me****]

16 hours ago, Slave2WhiteWomen said:

I thought that WhatsApp is live based without the need for ID and it’s and to end encrypted.

It is. But looking for a larger audience.

[ey****]

11 minutes ago, medwaylexi-cd said:

 

It is. But looking for a larger audience.

of which you need to make sure everyone is of the legal age, if the site does not use verification this becomes 100% your responsibility.  Failure to obligate would see you prosecuted for engaging with minors. 

[me****]

Thanks for the heads up o that one. That be a massive no then.



Way it’s looking I might as well just film and post to porn site still less agro

[ey****]

yeah, that's just it - sites where you're not age verification to post/stream explicit - no one is to watch it - and that does leave responsibility onto you

posting porn also requires ID verification to show it's stuff you have the rights to post/share

[me****]

Grandfathered account so it does t need the id crap. Or at least didn’t last time

[ey****]

they will likely be asking for ID.  Most have had to retrospectively make sure everyone is compliant.

 

[me****]

Can I vote for edger friendly yet. I’ve had enough of this crap.

[ey****]

The kinda requirement for providing ID goes back to 1990.  There was a long period where it wasn't being asked for, on trust, and it ended up with a young lady finding a video of her being sexually ***ed when she was underage.  When sites then got audited, it was found there was an awful lot of stuff of people where it was without their consent, or where they weren't 18.

So now, a lot has to be en***d. 

I feel, sadly, it's more likely to get stricter before it gets relaxed - because who in reality would propose a vote, and be backed on a vote, to no longer require people prove their age to post adult content?

[me****]

I agree with the logic. And the reason. Just don’t agree with the blanket use of it for anything they please