Website Logo

Sex Scandals: A Quick ***k at History's Most Notorious

Sex, shenanigans and shame; a good sex scandal never goes out of fashion. We take a look at three of history's greatest sex scandals.
 

Our culture is obsessed with a juicy sex scandal, the more sordid, the better. In between tut-tutting and being uncomfortably aroused, we like to imagine that things were better in an earlier, more civilised age. But we're wrong. Our ancestors were a little more reluctant to print the sweaty details of their sex scandals, but what we do know about them suggests that they were every bit as depraved. We had a look at what it is that makes a sex scandal so scandalous. 
 

sign up banner fetish.com

 

The Reynolds affair: presidential mistress

A hit Broadway musical about his life has made American founding father Alexander Hamilton famous again. However, the real joy for those of us who enjoy the history of human prurience is the attention it's given to the “Reynolds affair.” Suspected in 1792 of misusing his government post to help a swindler named James Reynolds, Hamilton was ***d to tell a government committee, headed by future president James Monroe, that he had actually been paying blackmail *** to Reynolds, whose ex-wife Maria had been Hamilton's mistress. Monroe leaked the evidence, which came to light in 1797.

An older, married man, a young woman, a scheming husband – sounds like a classic sex scandal, right? The difference is that instead of denying everything, Hamilton published a 95-page pamphlet explaining the history of his affair as a way of clearing his name from the other charges. He even included his mistress's execrably-spelt love letters and her husband's menacing demands, as well as a few shots at his political rivals. His political career took a nasty hit, and history does not record what Mrs Hamilton had to say.

 

Victorian woman sex scandal
The Victorians weren't too prude for a sex scandal. Image: via Shutterstock.com

 

Suing the Prince: Victorian sensibilities

We think of the Victorians as prudish, and maybe they were – after all, previous Princes of Wales had been drunken playboys, and mostly, people didn't take them to court. But when Lady Harriet Mordaunt, wife of Sir Charles Mordaunt, gave birth to a child with severe medical problems, she confessed to her doctors that they just might be the result of syphilis.

How did Lady Harriet Mordaunt get syphilis, you ask? Why by frequent affairs with a range of aristocratic lovers including the Prince of Wales. This was pretty plausible – the future Edward VII was a regular visitor to brothels and carried on affairs with dozens of women, ranging from actresses and prostitutes to noblewomen. The incautious prince even wound up in court over the Mordaunt affair, although only as a witness.

The Mordaunt divorce trial was shaping up to be one of the biggest sex scandals of the age, but Harriet's father stepped in to prevent it spiralling out of control. He publicly announced that his daughter was mad and she spent the rest of her life in mental hospitals. Charles Mordaunt eventually got his divorce when another nobleman, Viscount Cole, fessed up to being the baby's father. The moral of the story is: sleep with who you like, but in Victorian England, it's not wise to talk about it.

 

Fatty Arbuckle: 1920s celebrity sex scandal

Our media loves to tell tales of naughty celebrities. Who's sleeping with who? Who got out of a car without any pants on? Who's got some mild kink imagery in their music videos? Yeah, yeah, you amateurs. Come back when you've fucked someone to death. The suspect: Roscoe “Fatty” Arbuckle, the beloved star of silent comedies (although not really that fat by modern standards). His contract with Paramount Pictures was worth a million dollars – in 1920 ***. That's about $13 million today, which is pretty good. But all Fatty's *** couldn't save him when the law came calling in 1921.

An aspiring actress, Virginia Rappe, had died following a party at a San Francisco hotel. A friend of hers suggested that Arbuckle had ***d her and that his huge weight had caused her ruptured bladder. This sex scandal lead to a media circus after the trial went through two juries. The third acquitted Arbuckle and even wrote him a formal letter of apology, declaring that he was “in no way responsible” for Rappe's death.

Owing to the fact, the actress had a history of ill health, and there was no evidence to suggest that the two had slept together, let alone that he had ***d her. By this time, though, legendary media scumbag William Randolph Hearst's newspapers had run wild on Arbuckle, suggesting among other things that he had ***d Rappe with a champagne bottle. Arbuckle's career was dead; studios even destroyed copies of films he'd already made. Although he did gradually return to making movies, Arbuckle was never the same. That's what a sex scandal can do for you!


Signup banner fetish.com

 

Do you know of another infamous sex scandal that we missed here? Share your thoughts in the Fetish.com forum.

Magazine Banner - Join Now [Fetish.com] (1)-min.jpg

Cover image: Orange County Archives via Flickr.com CC BY 2.0 license

 

Comment

Comments


    Related Discussions

    Related Discussions

    A newbie Mistress learning from an experienced sub

    Hello, I'm curious if this is common among newbie Mistresses to use their subs as a source of knowledge how to properly guide a submissive man. I don't mean fake dommes but everyone was a beginner once and gained necessary knowledge step by step from various sources. So the question is addressed to those Mistresses who are aware of their beginner status but want to learn and improve their skills. 30 Likes 17 Replies· about 1 month ago

    Ballbusting search history

    "Hey, can I come in?" she asked, her voice low and sultry, a smirk hidden on her lips. "Yeah, what's up?" I asked, surprised to see her here without a heads-up. "I think you know what's up," she said, her voice dripping with suggestion. At that moment, the hairs on the back of my neck stood on end. I could feel my heart beating faster with anticipation. "No... can't think of anything. Could you explain why you're here?" She took a step closer, her eyes locked onto mine. She reached out and gently traced a finger along my jawline, sending shivers down my spine. "You know, I've always sensed there was something... different about you." My gaze drifted downward, settling on her shoes. They were a pair of sleek, black leather pumps with thick, imposing soles. My heart skipped a beat as I imagined the feeling of those soles against my skin. "Those shoes..." I whispered, my voice barely audible. She leaned closer, her breath warm against my ear. "Something that makes you crave a certain kind of... attention." My eyes widened, my heart pounding in my chest as I realized what she was talking about. "How...?" I asked, nearly trembling. "Stop." She took another step closer, a predatory glint in her eyes. "Remember how you let me log into my *** on your laptop to check a couple of things?" "Oh no..." I said it as the life seemed to drain from my body. The fact was, I'd been watching ballbusting videos on that laptop over the last couple of days. She'd seen them. "You checked my history," I said in anguish. "No. I checked the history on my account, actually. Believe it or not, I'm not that invasive." She said it in a smug, condescending tone. "I'm so—" Trying to apologize, I was cut off. "Shut it. Can I kick your balls or not?" My eyes widened in shock, my face flushing with embarrassment and a hint of excitement. "I-I..." The words caught in my throat. I couldn't believe she was bringing up my dirty little secret like this. I was torn between *** and excitement. "Yes," I finally whispered, my voice barely audible. "You can... kick my balls." "Just once... or are you mine?" she asked wickedly, a grin of ownership spreading across her face, cruelty glistening in her eyes, fueled by passion. My eyes locked onto hers, a mix of *** and desire swirling inside me. I swallowed hard, my throat tight as I tried to process her words. "Yours," I breathed, my voice trembling with surrender. "I'm yours... and you can do whatever you want to me." "Then spread them. NOW!" she commanded with urgency and conquest. My legs began to tremble as I slowly spread them apart, never taking my eyes off hers. I was acutely aware of the power dynamic at play, and the thrill of submitting to her dominance was almost overwhelming. "Like this?" I asked, my voice husky with anticipation and a hint of ***. She grinned, a sadistic glint in her eyes as she watched me brace myself. She didn't give me a moment to prepare. "You asked for it," she said, her voice dripping with cruel pleasure. 19 Likes· 3 months ago

    Submission vs Slavery: Understanding the Difference, the History and How Someone Discovers They Are Truly Submissive

    One thing i've noticed over the years is that people often blur the lines between submission and slavery, they use the words interchangeably, assume they mean the same thing or automatically label themselves based on fantasy rather than lived experience. For this blog post I wanted to focus primarily on submission. I'm not going to write this from the perspective of someone who has lived in a Master/slave dynamic because I haven't. I've never had a slave, I don't identify as a Mistress and I never intend to. My experience lies within Dominant/submissive dynamics, mentoring, educating and building relationships centred around consent, trust, communication and personal growth. That said, over many years in the BDSM lifestyle i've met people from every corner of the community. I've had conversations with Dominants, submissives, Masters, Mistresses and slaves. While there are naturally different opinions depending on experience and philosophy, there are also recurring themes that help separate these roles. A Simple Way to Understand the Difference One of the easiest ways I explain it to beginners is by thinking about the amount of authority each dynamic is built around. Dominant/Domme and submissive I often describe this as a relationship where each person still retains significant personal autonomy, a submissive voluntarily follows the Dominant's authority but they continue to negotiate limits, communicate openly and remain an active participant in shaping the relationship. Likewise, the Dominant leads, guides and makes decisions within the agreed framework but that authority exists because it has been freely granted and can be renegotiated or withdrawn. For many people, this feels like a relationship where both partners continue to exercise meaningful agency throughout the dynamic. Master/Mistress and slave In many Master/slave dynamics, the intention is different. A slave may voluntarily surrender a far greater degree of day to day decision making and authority to their Master or Mistress as part of an agreed relationship structure. This does **not** mean they lose legal rights or the ability to revoke consent but rather, it reflects a deeper negotiated commitment in which authority extends into many more areas of daily life than is typical in many Dominant/submissive relationships. This is why many people view slavery as a much more comprehensive lifestyle commitment rather than simply a more intense version of submission. Why Dominant/submissive Dynamics Often Have More Flexibility One difference i've observed over the years is flexibility. Many Dominants and submissives may enjoy attending events, workshops, demonstrations or play parties. Some couples negotiate scenes with others, have trusted play partners or separate emotional relationships from negotiated BDSM play and others remain completely exclusive. Every relationship decides its own rules. Master/slave dynamics however, are often built around a much deeper level of exclusivity and service, many couples view the relationship as a complete lifestyle commitment rather than simply a BDSM relationship, meaning outside play is often not part of the agreement and that isn't true for every M/s relationship but it is a common approach. The important point is that neither dynamic is "better", they simply pursue different relationship goals. Submission Doesn't Mean Weakness One of the biggest misconceptions I still encounter is the belief that submissive people are weak, nothing could be further from the truth. A genuinely healthy submissive chooses to submit, they choose who earns that privilege and they decide whether a Dominant has demonstrated enough integrity, emotional intelligence, consistency and responsibility to deserve their trust. That isn't weakness, that is discernment. In fact, i'd argue that the healthiest submissives often possess incredible emotional strength because they understand exactly what they are giving someone else. The History Behind Submission and Slavery Power exchange has existed throughout human history in many forms. Long before modern BDSM communities developed, literature, ritual, religious practices and historical societies explored voluntary acts of service, devotion, hierarchy and authority. The structured Dominant/submissive relationships we recognise today were shaped largely through twentieth century BDSM communities, where negotiation, informed consent, communication and mutual respect became defining principles. Master/slave dynamics also evolved within these communities, drawing on concepts of complete service and authority while distinguishing themselves through an even greater emphasis on negotiated commitment and responsibility. Although both dynamics involve power exchange, the philosophy behind them is often different. Submission usually focuses on offering trust, obedience and service within agreed boundaries. Slavery often focuses on offering one's service and identity more comprehensively within a carefully negotiated relationship. Again, every dynamic is unique and no two relationships look exactly alike. Historical Examples Throughout history there have been many examples of individuals voluntarily dedicating themselves to serving another person or institution, members of religious orders who took vows of obedience are one example of structured voluntary submission to an authority. While not BDSM, they illustrate how people have long chosen to place themselves under guidance as part of a meaningful commitment. By contrast, the word "slavery" has a long and ***ful history connected to ***d human enslavement, modern consensual Master/slave relationships are fundamentally different because they are based on informed, voluntary consent between adults, not *** or ownership in the legal or historical sense. The BDSM community generally distinguishes these consensual dynamics from historical slavery because the ethical foundation is entirely different. But This Blog Isn't About Slavery As interesting as Master/slave dynamics are, that isn't the purpose of this post. This post is about submission because submission is one of the most misunderstood roles I come across. People often assume they're submissive simply because they enjoy being tied up, or because they enjoy being spanked, or because they like someone taking charge in the bedroom and those things can absolutely be enjoyable but they don't automatically make someone submissive. So How Does Someone Know They're Submissive? The answer usually isn't found in what turns you on, it's found in how you naturally connect with another person. Many submissives discover that they genuinely enjoy allowing someone they deeply trust to lead, they often find fulfilment in making another person's life easier, offering support, following agreed guidance or expressing care through acts of service, attentiveness and devotion. For some, submission only exists during scenes. For others, it becomes part of everyday life. Some people enjoy protocols, whereas others don't. Some love rituals while others simply enjoy knowing someone else is steering the relationship. Submission has many different expressions, what matters is not how dramatic it looks from the outside but how authentic it feels to the people living it. Becoming Submissive Isn't Something You Decide Overnight This is another mistake I see repeatedly, people join FetLife and a week later they're announcing they're a "high protocol slave" or they claim to be a "24/7 submissive" despite never having experienced a real dynamic. The reality is that submission develops through experience, it develops through self awareness, through reflection, through making mistakes, through learning your boundaries, through understanding your needs and through discovering what feels genuine rather than simply exciting. A title doesn't make someone submissive, their behaviour does, their consistency does, their honesty does and their willingness to communicate does. Submission Is a Choice Made Every Day Perhaps the most beautiful thing about submission is that it isn't something taken, it is something given every single day. A submissive wakes up and chooses to continue offering their trust and a Dominant wakes up and chooses to continue proving they deserve it, that's why I believe submission is never about losing yourself and it's about consciously choosing who gets access to the deepest parts of who you already are. That is why after all these years, submission continues to fascinate me. It isn't simply about obedience, it is about psychology, vulnerability, responsibility, communication and an extraordinary level of trust between two people who understand that real power exchange isn't built through control alone, it is built through mutual respect. 45 Likes 11 Replies· 4 months ago

    Mistress and Slaves

    What is your favorite command to get from a Mistress ? 49 Likes 99 Replies· 2 days ago

    New mistress

    What is important for a new mistress to know? From a sub point of view or dom point of view? 1 Like 13 Replies· 6 months ago