Difference between a bottom and a submissive

[Mr****]

Men are simple. We want a monarch. Your intent is believed; but masculinity is an energy defined by execution, by projection of intent manifest as an alteration of space and matter in time.

It is the desire of the masculine to execute and to define. It is the desire of the feminine to perceive and to enable. Then the cogitative aspect intertwines these—to optimize and to refine—in a bidirectional way.

This is also the root of the problem you note, as framed in this model: masculine energy wants to "do the things that clearly show placement and position in the hierarchy of existence." This is the garish element that the feminine in you is averse to. That is fair; but then consider, as leader, what is your vision for the cycle from the feminine (you, and they as submissive) to the masculine (them, and you as supervisor) and back again? Can you detail that vision without waver, as though your intent carried the weight of generations? Bring such yapping pups to heel. They will do as you instruct if the authority of your absolute plan is sufficiently strong; and in your absolute monarchy, you will find that such dogs elevate themselves to remain in your presence and under your guidance. Then your nature needs only to reap the rewards of your steady leadership and their consistent execution. Make them live for your "Good boy", make them strive to defeat themselves for a glimpse of your softness.

May your queendom rise to the level you seek.

[su****]

I think you’re right and on the opposite end of things as a submissive, I feel like most of the men on here are tops looking for bottoms, not Doms looking for submissives.