NSA and kink

[Br****]

NSA Kink means that boundaries are going to be set, you play or have a kink scene, and then you may never meet again.

[ch****]

BDSM is different the Swinging go google books and find the difference between both. Remember this lady I dated years ago. She only wanted BDSM
She had a dungeon in her house
Other couple I played with mostly Cuck couples very much different because they were both involved Hotwife situation.
There again read books they are out there

[Be****]

Thursday at 04:14 PM, Barthold said:

I can see what you mean and you brought up some valid concerns that more people need to be aware of, UTIs for example can be a endless cycle of antibiotics for too many women even in committed monogamous relationships just because a lot of men tend to show less to no symptoms and are generally less likely to seek treatment when symptoms actually do show up

But the mentions of a potential third party and „kink“ outside of „BDSM“ where mostly inspired by what you wrote(no use trying to be „innocent“ now😉)
Sure i would say any thing one could comfortably call a „dynamic“ shouldn’t qualify as „NSA“ but if your dynamic allows the involvement of other people then there is no strict need for you to tie yourself to extra attachments with those people as long as your dom(i assume) takes your boundaries and safety seriously enough

And condoms are great for sharing toys too, both for the ones used internally and you can cut them to protect you from potential contamination from external things like suction toys
Just a suggestion

Exactly 💯💯💯🤣

[Be****]

For a vast majority of the BDSM community, it has absolutely nothing to do with sex. 🤷‍♀️

[ch****]

BDSM is about control or the concept of control that’s why it’s called
* Bondage and Disipline
* Dominates and Submissions
* Sadism and Masocistic

[Deleted Member]

Saturday at 10:06 PM, Beffi said:

For a vast majority of the BDSM community, it has absolutely nothing to do with sex. 🤷‍♀️

Yeah, it's more so all about power and control. Especially from what I've witnessed.

[Th****]

It’s a case by case basis. People are giving their opinions based on how they see things but people with proper reputation for upholding the principles and conducting as a pillar example would be like winning something life changing. No fucking around with bullshit. You have a contract with both parties requests and they do what they both want to do which is fulfil what’s in the contract and the way they want to show up for their dynamic and then he leads with the energy she needs to gain the fulfilment and structure that keeps you true to the connection. Like a relationship that you are bound to stay connected with or the contract is basically broken. Pretty sure most ppl just wear a collar and don’t have an idea on how in depth sex can be.

But for argument sake I pretty much just wing it but I got up to some mischief with her. She had way more to her limits

[ey****]

Generally. I hate the absolutes of BDSM being "nothing to do with sex" or it necessarily being about sex

I mean, we are on a site called fetish - and the very definition of fetish (and even later evolved versions) is sexual.

Of course - for a lot of people it is not about sex, there are a lot of people who are asexual in the community - and then also where they can have play where neither intercourse nor even orgasm or anything else which could constitute as sex is either the goal, required, or happens.   Though a lot of community spaces do the "It's not sexual" because it being sexual, or not, does make a whole lot of difference when it comes to licensing and legislation.   We also cannot assume that no sex at the venue doesn't equate to sex later

But still.  You can still meet people for play without it ending in anything sexual and it still being NSA.  If I met up with someone tomorrow to suck her toes and then went home, we've not had sex.  

 

[Be****]

Truth 💯💯💯