Website Logo

The History Of High Heels | What's Behind This Common Fetish?

Have you got a thing for high heels? You're in good company! We traced the history of high heels and why this is a common fetish today.
 

The history of high heels started with them initially being a tool of war and dominance used by aristocrats; though there are records of Egyptians wearing heels. They were first popularised in Western cultures in the 15th century - when they were worn by Persians to stabilise themselves in their stirrups while shooting bow and arrow from the back of a horse. When high heels ended up in European countries, it was aristocratic men who were wearing heels to gain height, and thereby dominance and power.
 

The history of high heels

The first women to wear heels were 16th-century Italian Courtesans. As high-ranking sex workers, they spent most of their time with men. As a result, they were supposed to be more relatable to men. This meant that they were allowed to follow masculine pursuits such as drinking, reading, smoking, and wearing heels. Perhaps that was the beginnings of the now common high heel fetish.

High heels were an androgynous and erotic symbol that these high-class sex workers were able to adopt due to their access to things “respectable” women could not even consider.

 

Article Image Template - Fetish.com (19)-min.png


The history of high heels is pretty far from the Dominatrix we think of today.

 

Chopines: the beginning of high heels

The history of high heels started with Chopines - the precursors to platform heels that could be up to 10 inches in height and often required the help of men to get around. They became popular wear for courtesans and patrician women in the 15th, 16th, and 17th centuries. The taller the chopine, the more fabric required to reach the ground - and the wealthier you were.
 

Louis XIV played a significant role in the history of high heels

However, the adoption of heels by courtesans and high-ranking women did not keep them from being a male symbol of power. High heels were still a masculine fashion item in the 18th century when Louis XIV featured red-***ted soles on his shoes (sorry, Christian Louboutin!) and allowed people who were close to him to sport similarly red soles.

During this time, women wearing heels was still thought of as gender-bending, and wearing traditionally masculine clothing and accessories was, as it still is, a fashion-stoked endeavour for aristocratic and high-class women.

 

sign up banner fetish.com

 

High heels - a power thing

When democracy became the trend in the 19th century, heels - gaining height over others - was considered “un-democratic” and they went out of fashion. It wasn't until the early 20th century when fetish photographers realised that heels made one’s rear look amazing that they started to become associated with women. 

There are still elements of the masculine, dominance and power, in how we think about our high heel fetish. We associate them with strong women, especially the archetype of the femme fatale. There’s a reason why the domina is more commonly associated with sky-high heels than the innocent girl next door.
 

Caitlin is a writer, sex educator, consultant, and product reviewer who focuses primarily on issues of sex toy and accessory safety, pleasure, sexuality, gender, and more.


Signup banner fetish.com

 

Did anything surprise you in this history of high heels? Do you have a fetish for high heels? Share your thoughts in the Fetish.com forum. 

Magazine Banner - Join Now [Fetish.com] (1)-min.jpg

Images: via Shutterstock.com
2 Comments

Add a comment


    Related Discussions

    Related Discussions

    Ballbusting search history

    "Hey, can I come in?" she asked, her voice low and sultry, a smirk hidden on her lips. "Yeah, what's up?" I asked, surprised to see her here without a heads-up. "I think you know what's up," she said, her voice dripping with suggestion. At that moment, the hairs on the back of my neck stood on end. I could feel my heart beating faster with anticipation. "No... can't think of anything. Could you explain why you're here?" She took a step closer, her eyes locked onto mine. She reached out and gently traced a finger along my jawline, sending shivers down my spine. "You know, I've always sensed there was something... different about you." My gaze drifted downward, settling on her shoes. They were a pair of sleek, black leather pumps with thick, imposing soles. My heart skipped a beat as I imagined the feeling of those soles against my skin. "Those shoes..." I whispered, my voice barely audible. She leaned closer, her breath warm against my ear. "Something that makes you crave a certain kind of... attention." My eyes widened, my heart pounding in my chest as I realized what she was talking about. "How...?" I asked, nearly trembling. "Stop." She took another step closer, a predatory glint in her eyes. "Remember how you let me log into my *** on your laptop to check a couple of things?" "Oh no..." I said it as the life seemed to drain from my body. The fact was, I'd been watching ballbusting videos on that laptop over the last couple of days. She'd seen them. "You checked my history," I said in anguish. "No. I checked the history on my account, actually. Believe it or not, I'm not that invasive." She said it in a smug, condescending tone. "I'm so—" Trying to apologize, I was cut off. "Shut it. Can I kick your balls or not?" My eyes widened in shock, my face flushing with embarrassment and a hint of excitement. "I-I..." The words caught in my throat. I couldn't believe she was bringing up my dirty little secret like this. I was torn between *** and excitement. "Yes," I finally whispered, my voice barely audible. "You can... kick my balls." "Just once... or are you mine?" she asked wickedly, a grin of ownership spreading across her face, cruelty glistening in her eyes, fueled by passion. My eyes locked onto hers, a mix of *** and desire swirling inside me. I swallowed hard, my throat tight as I tried to process her words. "Yours," I breathed, my voice trembling with surrender. "I'm yours... and you can do whatever you want to me." "Then spread them. NOW!" she commanded with urgency and conquest. My legs began to tremble as I slowly spread them apart, never taking my eyes off hers. I was acutely aware of the power dynamic at play, and the thrill of submitting to her dominance was almost overwhelming. "Like this?" I asked, my voice husky with anticipation and a hint of ***. She grinned, a sadistic glint in her eyes as she watched me brace myself. She didn't give me a moment to prepare. "You asked for it," she said, her voice dripping with cruel pleasure. 19 Likes· 3 months ago

    Submission vs Slavery: Understanding the Difference, the History and How Someone Discovers They Are Truly Submissive

    One thing i've noticed over the years is that people often blur the lines between submission and slavery, they use the words interchangeably, assume they mean the same thing or automatically label themselves based on fantasy rather than lived experience. For this blog post I wanted to focus primarily on submission. I'm not going to write this from the perspective of someone who has lived in a Master/slave dynamic because I haven't. I've never had a slave, I don't identify as a Mistress and I never intend to. My experience lies within Dominant/submissive dynamics, mentoring, educating and building relationships centred around consent, trust, communication and personal growth. That said, over many years in the BDSM lifestyle i've met people from every corner of the community. I've had conversations with Dominants, submissives, Masters, Mistresses and slaves. While there are naturally different opinions depending on experience and philosophy, there are also recurring themes that help separate these roles. A Simple Way to Understand the Difference One of the easiest ways I explain it to beginners is by thinking about the amount of authority each dynamic is built around. Dominant/Domme and submissive I often describe this as a relationship where each person still retains significant personal autonomy, a submissive voluntarily follows the Dominant's authority but they continue to negotiate limits, communicate openly and remain an active participant in shaping the relationship. Likewise, the Dominant leads, guides and makes decisions within the agreed framework but that authority exists because it has been freely granted and can be renegotiated or withdrawn. For many people, this feels like a relationship where both partners continue to exercise meaningful agency throughout the dynamic. Master/Mistress and slave In many Master/slave dynamics, the intention is different. A slave may voluntarily surrender a far greater degree of day to day decision making and authority to their Master or Mistress as part of an agreed relationship structure. This does **not** mean they lose legal rights or the ability to revoke consent but rather, it reflects a deeper negotiated commitment in which authority extends into many more areas of daily life than is typical in many Dominant/submissive relationships. This is why many people view slavery as a much more comprehensive lifestyle commitment rather than simply a more intense version of submission. Why Dominant/submissive Dynamics Often Have More Flexibility One difference i've observed over the years is flexibility. Many Dominants and submissives may enjoy attending events, workshops, demonstrations or play parties. Some couples negotiate scenes with others, have trusted play partners or separate emotional relationships from negotiated BDSM play and others remain completely exclusive. Every relationship decides its own rules. Master/slave dynamics however, are often built around a much deeper level of exclusivity and service, many couples view the relationship as a complete lifestyle commitment rather than simply a BDSM relationship, meaning outside play is often not part of the agreement and that isn't true for every M/s relationship but it is a common approach. The important point is that neither dynamic is "better", they simply pursue different relationship goals. Submission Doesn't Mean Weakness One of the biggest misconceptions I still encounter is the belief that submissive people are weak, nothing could be further from the truth. A genuinely healthy submissive chooses to submit, they choose who earns that privilege and they decide whether a Dominant has demonstrated enough integrity, emotional intelligence, consistency and responsibility to deserve their trust. That isn't weakness, that is discernment. In fact, i'd argue that the healthiest submissives often possess incredible emotional strength because they understand exactly what they are giving someone else. The History Behind Submission and Slavery Power exchange has existed throughout human history in many forms. Long before modern BDSM communities developed, literature, ritual, religious practices and historical societies explored voluntary acts of service, devotion, hierarchy and authority. The structured Dominant/submissive relationships we recognise today were shaped largely through twentieth century BDSM communities, where negotiation, informed consent, communication and mutual respect became defining principles. Master/slave dynamics also evolved within these communities, drawing on concepts of complete service and authority while distinguishing themselves through an even greater emphasis on negotiated commitment and responsibility. Although both dynamics involve power exchange, the philosophy behind them is often different. Submission usually focuses on offering trust, obedience and service within agreed boundaries. Slavery often focuses on offering one's service and identity more comprehensively within a carefully negotiated relationship. Again, every dynamic is unique and no two relationships look exactly alike. Historical Examples Throughout history there have been many examples of individuals voluntarily dedicating themselves to serving another person or institution, members of religious orders who took vows of obedience are one example of structured voluntary submission to an authority. While not BDSM, they illustrate how people have long chosen to place themselves under guidance as part of a meaningful commitment. By contrast, the word "slavery" has a long and ***ful history connected to ***d human enslavement, modern consensual Master/slave relationships are fundamentally different because they are based on informed, voluntary consent between adults, not *** or ownership in the legal or historical sense. The BDSM community generally distinguishes these consensual dynamics from historical slavery because the ethical foundation is entirely different. But This Blog Isn't About Slavery As interesting as Master/slave dynamics are, that isn't the purpose of this post. This post is about submission because submission is one of the most misunderstood roles I come across. People often assume they're submissive simply because they enjoy being tied up, or because they enjoy being spanked, or because they like someone taking charge in the bedroom and those things can absolutely be enjoyable but they don't automatically make someone submissive. So How Does Someone Know They're Submissive? The answer usually isn't found in what turns you on, it's found in how you naturally connect with another person. Many submissives discover that they genuinely enjoy allowing someone they deeply trust to lead, they often find fulfilment in making another person's life easier, offering support, following agreed guidance or expressing care through acts of service, attentiveness and devotion. For some, submission only exists during scenes. For others, it becomes part of everyday life. Some people enjoy protocols, whereas others don't. Some love rituals while others simply enjoy knowing someone else is steering the relationship. Submission has many different expressions, what matters is not how dramatic it looks from the outside but how authentic it feels to the people living it. Becoming Submissive Isn't Something You Decide Overnight This is another mistake I see repeatedly, people join FetLife and a week later they're announcing they're a "high protocol slave" or they claim to be a "24/7 submissive" despite never having experienced a real dynamic. The reality is that submission develops through experience, it develops through self awareness, through reflection, through making mistakes, through learning your boundaries, through understanding your needs and through discovering what feels genuine rather than simply exciting. A title doesn't make someone submissive, their behaviour does, their consistency does, their honesty does and their willingness to communicate does. Submission Is a Choice Made Every Day Perhaps the most beautiful thing about submission is that it isn't something taken, it is something given every single day. A submissive wakes up and chooses to continue offering their trust and a Dominant wakes up and chooses to continue proving they deserve it, that's why I believe submission is never about losing yourself and it's about consciously choosing who gets access to the deepest parts of who you already are. That is why after all these years, submission continues to fascinate me. It isn't simply about obedience, it is about psychology, vulnerability, responsibility, communication and an extraordinary level of trust between two people who understand that real power exchange isn't built through control alone, it is built through mutual respect. 45 Likes 11 Replies· 4 months ago

    BDSM HISTORY CELEBRATION

    This month, celebrate influential, kinky, and empowering women shaping BDSM Share icons, whether dominant figures or contributors, discussing their significant impact on your journey 🌟 237 Likes 10 Replies· over 1 year ago

    Celebrating Women's History Month

    To celebrate Womens History Month, I thought it would be nice to start a thread of women that have inspired you . Mine would be Lady Hale AKA the Beyonce of the legal professional The first female President of the UK's Supreme Court. She reformed numerous legislation to safeguard the most *** *** and adults of our society She wasn't afraid to speak her mind through her use of brooches, particulary when dealing with Iraq and Bozza She was a staunch feminist, creating a coat of arms the motto of which means, 'women are equal to everything' 8 Likes 24 Replies· over 3 years ago

    Advice: my sexual history triggers my partner

    Really tough one here and I want genuine advice for the situation.. I am in a relationship with someone and they are struggling to come to terms with my sexual history. I am quite a proudly kink positive person (sub) dating a very loving soft Dom. He found out a few months into our relationship that when I was 19 I had an orgy. I personally believe it was a good experience as it was fun, I learnt a lot about myself and I became braver sexually. Although orgies are not for me I feel like I tried something and I am happy with that. My partner has had a traumatic experience that relates to that topic. I had no idea of this, so when speaking with close friends and him about this occasion I triggered him. It was hard for him to verbalise but a few months on we finally got to the root of the issue. He did some research and thinks we see sex differently as I do not tie intimacy to sex inherently whereas he cannot separate them. Initially I was angry at the thought someone could not accept my past and who I was / have become, but after a lot of talking I know he is really trying to move past his trauma. I wondered if anyone else has had similar issues and how they helped their partners/ were able to move forwards? He had been speaking about trying to separate his idea of intimacy and sex but I do not want him to change his beliefs or way he sees sex with me. 6 Likes 9 Replies· almost 4 years ago