Website Logo

Discover the History of Masturbation

What does masturbation in the 18th-century have to do with Cornflakes? As we move into Masturbation Month this May, kinky writer Leo Larkin answers this puzzler and shares some facts about the history of masturbation. And believe us; we have it so much better now!

 

Self-love, wanking, fingering, jacking off, jerking off: however you want to call it, masturbation is something I think we agree that we can all agree to doing and enjoying – even when we're partnered.
 

kinky_320x50_EN.gif


But it wasn't all this way as I will show you believe in this brief history of masturbation. And while, on the whole, things have improved, self-love is still frowned upon by some sections of society. For example, some religions today such as Roman Catholic, Eastern Orthodox and Oriental Orthodox still consider masturbation to be a sin. Indeed, it's been suggested that the more religious a person is, the more the likelihood of them restricting their sexual desires.

 

Medieval history of masturbation 

In the medieval history of masturbation, moral authorities – such as the church – took a pretty dim view of self-love. Indeed, as well as masturbation, non-standard sexual positions, oral sex and plenty more fun things were considered no-no's in the penitentials.
 

300x250_Breathles_EN.png


Medieval texts advised priests on what penances were appropriate to give sinners who confessed these acts. For instance, the 'Canons of Theodore', a collection of penitential material dating to around 700 AD, states that a man who "pollutes himself" is to do penance for 40 days. While a woman who "has sex with herself" has to do penance for three years (!). That's a pretty striking double standard.


The Canons also says that if you come in someone's mouth, you have to repent until the end of your life, so it's not exactly what you'd call a sex-positive document (surely snowballing would have been punishable by death, LOL).


the-history-of-masturbation.jpg
Feeling fruity? Discover the history of masturbation...

 

The medieval view (at least the official one) was that masturbation was a moral evil. The only purpose of sex was reproduction and to signify God's love for the church; having sex for pleasure was missing the point. But as medieval faded into modern, and some traditional beliefs were abandoned, the official position on 'self-***' didn't change as much as you might think.

 

The history of masturbation gets medical

Early modern writers tended to abandon the medieval view that masturbating was a sin. At least, they didn't make it the central plank of their argument. Instead of arguing that masturbation was just wrong, this new generation of hands-off advocates tried to persuade their readers that masturbation could damage your health.
 

kinky_FET_300X250_EN.gif


And how they persuaded! Probably the first great anti-masturbation text is – draws breath – Onania or the Heinous Sin of self-Pollution, And All Its Frightful Consequences, In Both Sexes, Considered: With Spiritual and Physical Advice To Those Who Have Already Injured Themselves By This Abominable Practice. 


MORE LIKE THIS:

 

This 18th-century book outlines in lurid detail all of the terrible stuff that can happen to you if you play with yourself too much. The book goes on to explain that solo sex can lead to disorders of the penis and testicles, as well as gonorrhoea. In women, masturbation is terrible for the complexion, causes fluor albus (vaginal discharge) and, yep, can kill you.


But the book Onania isn't happy to focus merely on the medical effects: masturbation is also ruinous for the soul. Furthermore, God is watching you when you wank. So, here we have what we might think of as a hybrid. It's one part religious screed against the sin of masturbating, and one part medical text.

masturbation-history.jpg
Masturbation: who gives a f*ck if 'God is watching'...

 

Cornflakes & electroshock therapy 

The medical approach continued to dominate in the history of masturbation through the 19th and into the 20th centuries. One common argument against male masturbation comes up throughout the centuries, as in the 18th-century French text Onanism, or, A treatise on the disorders produced by masturbation. According to this theory, masturbation weakened men by draining the body of healthy, life-giving semen. 
 

300x250_Breathles_EN.png


And 1847's The Silent Friend argued that masturbation could cause – another deep breath – exhaustion of the system, nervous excitement, irritation, impotence, shrinking of the penis, indigestion, trouble breathing and hypochondriac melancholy. And if you're not in a state of hypochondriac melancholy after reading that list, I salute you on your endurance.

 

“In the medieval history of masturbation, the church took a dim view of self-love. Indeed, as well as masturbation, non-standard sexual positions, oral sex and plenty more fun things were considered no-no's.”


That being the case, people sought to curb masturbation through a variety of means from the ingenious to the horrible. In the 19th-century, health guru John Harvey Kellogg – of Cornflakes fame – wrote in his highly entertaining but slightly terrifying Plain Facts for Young and Old that masturbation could cause everything from constipation and heart disease to bad posture. As a treatment, he recommended, among other things, electric shocks to the genitals, abdominal bandages, cold baths, Cornflakes (no surprise there, then!), enemas and giving up smoking.


All this sounds pretty humorous, although maybe not so fantastic for the young man whose health-conscious parents *** him to give up spices, meat, milk, eggs, fish, coffee, alcohol and tobacco while sitting in a cold bath and eating corn mush. 

kinky_320x50_EN.gif


But there are worse ways to cure the solo sex habit. Take, for instance, the case of Dr Isaac Baker Brown, who attempted to treat masturbation (which he regarded as the cause of a whole host of illnesses) by means of a clitoridectomy. His 1866 monograph on the subject is ugly reading. Dr Baker Brown was expelled from the Obstetrical Society for his generally relaxed attitude toward informed consent. Still, while his case is extreme, it isn't utterly bizarre within the context of Victorian medicine.
 

Hurrah for 21st-century wanking!

Thankfully, the general consensus that masturbation causes every disease known to medical science (and probably crime as well) is long gone. Moving forward, the history of masturbation can be rewritten. In fact, today's doctors and medical professionals even think that there are a lot of health benefits to solo sex, but there's still a considerable way to go in breaking down taboos.


But, who knows? Maybe we'll be able to talk more frankly about pleasuring ourselves soon, which is what the Masturbation Month initiative aims to achieve – assuming we don't all die from it first. •
 

Leo Larkin writes about history and the humorous side of sex. Even though Leo is a pen name, he is a real person.
 

sign up to fetish.com


Share your kinky solo sex stories in the Fetish.com forum. 

BDSM forum Fetish.com

Images: shutterstock/ECOSY, shutterstock/Roman Samborskyi
20 Comments

Add a comment


    Related Discussions

    Related Discussions

    Ballbusting search history

    "Hey, can I come in?" she asked, her voice low and sultry, a smirk hidden on her lips. "Yeah, what's up?" I asked, surprised to see her here without a heads-up. "I think you know what's up," she said, her voice dripping with suggestion. At that moment, the hairs on the back of my neck stood on end. I could feel my heart beating faster with anticipation. "No... can't think of anything. Could you explain why you're here?" She took a step closer, her eyes locked onto mine. She reached out and gently traced a finger along my jawline, sending shivers down my spine. "You know, I've always sensed there was something... different about you." My gaze drifted downward, settling on her shoes. They were a pair of sleek, black leather pumps with thick, imposing soles. My heart skipped a beat as I imagined the feeling of those soles against my skin. "Those shoes..." I whispered, my voice barely audible. She leaned closer, her breath warm against my ear. "Something that makes you crave a certain kind of... attention." My eyes widened, my heart pounding in my chest as I realized what she was talking about. "How...?" I asked, nearly trembling. "Stop." She took another step closer, a predatory glint in her eyes. "Remember how you let me log into my *** on your laptop to check a couple of things?" "Oh no..." I said it as the life seemed to drain from my body. The fact was, I'd been watching ballbusting videos on that laptop over the last couple of days. She'd seen them. "You checked my history," I said in anguish. "No. I checked the history on my account, actually. Believe it or not, I'm not that invasive." She said it in a smug, condescending tone. "I'm so—" Trying to apologize, I was cut off. "Shut it. Can I kick your balls or not?" My eyes widened in shock, my face flushing with embarrassment and a hint of excitement. "I-I..." The words caught in my throat. I couldn't believe she was bringing up my dirty little secret like this. I was torn between *** and excitement. "Yes," I finally whispered, my voice barely audible. "You can... kick my balls." "Just once... or are you mine?" she asked wickedly, a grin of ownership spreading across her face, cruelty glistening in her eyes, fueled by passion. My eyes locked onto hers, a mix of *** and desire swirling inside me. I swallowed hard, my throat tight as I tried to process her words. "Yours," I breathed, my voice trembling with surrender. "I'm yours... and you can do whatever you want to me." "Then spread them. NOW!" she commanded with urgency and conquest. My legs began to tremble as I slowly spread them apart, never taking my eyes off hers. I was acutely aware of the power dynamic at play, and the thrill of submitting to her dominance was almost overwhelming. "Like this?" I asked, my voice husky with anticipation and a hint of ***. She grinned, a sadistic glint in her eyes as she watched me brace myself. She didn't give me a moment to prepare. "You asked for it," she said, her voice dripping with cruel pleasure. 19 Likes· 3 months ago

    Submission vs Slavery: Understanding the Difference, the History and How Someone Discovers They Are Truly Submissive

    One thing i've noticed over the years is that people often blur the lines between submission and slavery, they use the words interchangeably, assume they mean the same thing or automatically label themselves based on fantasy rather than lived experience. For this blog post I wanted to focus primarily on submission. I'm not going to write this from the perspective of someone who has lived in a Master/slave dynamic because I haven't. I've never had a slave, I don't identify as a Mistress and I never intend to. My experience lies within Dominant/submissive dynamics, mentoring, educating and building relationships centred around consent, trust, communication and personal growth. That said, over many years in the BDSM lifestyle i've met people from every corner of the community. I've had conversations with Dominants, submissives, Masters, Mistresses and slaves. While there are naturally different opinions depending on experience and philosophy, there are also recurring themes that help separate these roles. A Simple Way to Understand the Difference One of the easiest ways I explain it to beginners is by thinking about the amount of authority each dynamic is built around. Dominant/Domme and submissive I often describe this as a relationship where each person still retains significant personal autonomy, a submissive voluntarily follows the Dominant's authority but they continue to negotiate limits, communicate openly and remain an active participant in shaping the relationship. Likewise, the Dominant leads, guides and makes decisions within the agreed framework but that authority exists because it has been freely granted and can be renegotiated or withdrawn. For many people, this feels like a relationship where both partners continue to exercise meaningful agency throughout the dynamic. Master/Mistress and slave In many Master/slave dynamics, the intention is different. A slave may voluntarily surrender a far greater degree of day to day decision making and authority to their Master or Mistress as part of an agreed relationship structure. This does **not** mean they lose legal rights or the ability to revoke consent but rather, it reflects a deeper negotiated commitment in which authority extends into many more areas of daily life than is typical in many Dominant/submissive relationships. This is why many people view slavery as a much more comprehensive lifestyle commitment rather than simply a more intense version of submission. Why Dominant/submissive Dynamics Often Have More Flexibility One difference i've observed over the years is flexibility. Many Dominants and submissives may enjoy attending events, workshops, demonstrations or play parties. Some couples negotiate scenes with others, have trusted play partners or separate emotional relationships from negotiated BDSM play and others remain completely exclusive. Every relationship decides its own rules. Master/slave dynamics however, are often built around a much deeper level of exclusivity and service, many couples view the relationship as a complete lifestyle commitment rather than simply a BDSM relationship, meaning outside play is often not part of the agreement and that isn't true for every M/s relationship but it is a common approach. The important point is that neither dynamic is "better", they simply pursue different relationship goals. Submission Doesn't Mean Weakness One of the biggest misconceptions I still encounter is the belief that submissive people are weak, nothing could be further from the truth. A genuinely healthy submissive chooses to submit, they choose who earns that privilege and they decide whether a Dominant has demonstrated enough integrity, emotional intelligence, consistency and responsibility to deserve their trust. That isn't weakness, that is discernment. In fact, i'd argue that the healthiest submissives often possess incredible emotional strength because they understand exactly what they are giving someone else. The History Behind Submission and Slavery Power exchange has existed throughout human history in many forms. Long before modern BDSM communities developed, literature, ritual, religious practices and historical societies explored voluntary acts of service, devotion, hierarchy and authority. The structured Dominant/submissive relationships we recognise today were shaped largely through twentieth century BDSM communities, where negotiation, informed consent, communication and mutual respect became defining principles. Master/slave dynamics also evolved within these communities, drawing on concepts of complete service and authority while distinguishing themselves through an even greater emphasis on negotiated commitment and responsibility. Although both dynamics involve power exchange, the philosophy behind them is often different. Submission usually focuses on offering trust, obedience and service within agreed boundaries. Slavery often focuses on offering one's service and identity more comprehensively within a carefully negotiated relationship. Again, every dynamic is unique and no two relationships look exactly alike. Historical Examples Throughout history there have been many examples of individuals voluntarily dedicating themselves to serving another person or institution, members of religious orders who took vows of obedience are one example of structured voluntary submission to an authority. While not BDSM, they illustrate how people have long chosen to place themselves under guidance as part of a meaningful commitment. By contrast, the word "slavery" has a long and ***ful history connected to ***d human enslavement, modern consensual Master/slave relationships are fundamentally different because they are based on informed, voluntary consent between adults, not *** or ownership in the legal or historical sense. The BDSM community generally distinguishes these consensual dynamics from historical slavery because the ethical foundation is entirely different. But This Blog Isn't About Slavery As interesting as Master/slave dynamics are, that isn't the purpose of this post. This post is about submission because submission is one of the most misunderstood roles I come across. People often assume they're submissive simply because they enjoy being tied up, or because they enjoy being spanked, or because they like someone taking charge in the bedroom and those things can absolutely be enjoyable but they don't automatically make someone submissive. So How Does Someone Know They're Submissive? The answer usually isn't found in what turns you on, it's found in how you naturally connect with another person. Many submissives discover that they genuinely enjoy allowing someone they deeply trust to lead, they often find fulfilment in making another person's life easier, offering support, following agreed guidance or expressing care through acts of service, attentiveness and devotion. For some, submission only exists during scenes. For others, it becomes part of everyday life. Some people enjoy protocols, whereas others don't. Some love rituals while others simply enjoy knowing someone else is steering the relationship. Submission has many different expressions, what matters is not how dramatic it looks from the outside but how authentic it feels to the people living it. Becoming Submissive Isn't Something You Decide Overnight This is another mistake I see repeatedly, people join FetLife and a week later they're announcing they're a "high protocol slave" or they claim to be a "24/7 submissive" despite never having experienced a real dynamic. The reality is that submission develops through experience, it develops through self awareness, through reflection, through making mistakes, through learning your boundaries, through understanding your needs and through discovering what feels genuine rather than simply exciting. A title doesn't make someone submissive, their behaviour does, their consistency does, their honesty does and their willingness to communicate does. Submission Is a Choice Made Every Day Perhaps the most beautiful thing about submission is that it isn't something taken, it is something given every single day. A submissive wakes up and chooses to continue offering their trust and a Dominant wakes up and chooses to continue proving they deserve it, that's why I believe submission is never about losing yourself and it's about consciously choosing who gets access to the deepest parts of who you already are. That is why after all these years, submission continues to fascinate me. It isn't simply about obedience, it is about psychology, vulnerability, responsibility, communication and an extraordinary level of trust between two people who understand that real power exchange isn't built through control alone, it is built through mutual respect. 45 Likes 11 Replies· 4 months ago

    Wildest masturbation

    What’s your wildest masturbation story? Whether it was the object or the location. What made you do it and how was it. I’ll go first. When I was in training in the army we were in the field and I jacked off in my sleeping bag. No one was close to me but still not my proudest moment 21 Replies· over 1 year ago

    Masturbation toy storage

    What is the best way/ place to store a masturbation doll? I semi- recently bought a doll that is 2 feet tall and I've just been keeping her in the bag she came in (using corn starch and such to keep the silicone fresh) but the bag occasionally hugs the silicone making it difficult at times to pull her out of the bag/ put her back in. Any suggestions/ thoughts? 17 Likes 11 Replies· over 1 year ago

    MASTURBATION MENTALE

    La masturbation mentale, c’est l’art de stimuler le désir et le plaisir uniquement par l’imagination, en créant des fantasmes érotiques, en se remémorant des expériences ou en laissant l’esprit vagabonder. Alors, dis-nous : comment tu te chauffes juste avec ton imagination ? Partage tes techniques hallucinantes ci-dessous ! 💭🔥😉 16 Likes 16 Replies· about 1 year ago