CopperKnob Posted May 18, 2023 Author 2 minutes ago, PJ3000 said: I know, I'm done now.. cant tell if he's just trolling or if he really is that.. well.. oblivious đ¤ˇđťââď¸ kind of sad if he is. The evidence elsewhere suggests that that is exactly the case
PJ**** Posted May 18, 2023 2 minutes ago, CopperKnob said: The evidence elsewhere suggests that that is exactly the case Fuck I need some ice-cream! đđ
FETMOD-KF Posted May 18, 2023 yep - please there's difference of opinion, there's alternative view points, so on - and these are all valid this was done in bad faith and creating circular arguments. And so, please - no more, from anyone Â
CopperKnob Posted May 18, 2023 Author 3 minutes ago, PJ3000 said: Fuck I need some ice-cream! đđ That damn badger đ
DeviantInside Posted May 18, 2023 Ok⌠Iâm guilty. I like to think Iâm different but the reality is I have enough social, historical and unrecognised indoctrination that I adhere to certain stereotypes at a subconscious or unthinking level that itâs a thing. I try to be better but itâs still there. And I would go further than gender. Itâs race. Itâs sexual preference. Itâs hair colour. Itâs nerdy pastimes (even as a proud geek). Itâs all of these things and more. I have been bombarded with these things since I was born. Does that excuse them? Does it make them right? Does that change anything? Ultimately no. Ultimately if o want anything to change and the world to change overall fist and foremost I have to change myself. And that starts by trying to recognise my faults. Will I get it right or find it easy? No probably not. But you keep trying to find the world you want by changing yourself and (maybe) influencing others towards what would be the best it can be.
CopperKnob Posted May 18, 2023 Author 13 minutes ago, DeviantInside said: Ok⌠Iâm guilty. I like to think Iâm different but the reality is I have enough social, historical and unrecognised indoctrination that I adhere to certain stereotypes at a subconscious or unthinking level that itâs a thing. I try to be better but itâs still there. And I would go further than gender. Itâs race. Itâs sexual preference. Itâs hair colour. Itâs nerdy pastimes (even as a proud geek). Itâs all of these things and more. I have been bombarded with these things since I was born. Does that excuse them? Does it make them right? Does that change anything? Ultimately no. Ultimately if o want anything to change and the world to change overall fist and foremost I have to change myself. And that starts by trying to recognise my faults. Will I get it right or find it easy? No probably not. But you keep trying to find the world you want by changing yourself and (maybe) influencing others towards what would be the best it can be. I think if everyone was honest we all are and some of that is due to culture and generational factors. The point is, is that we recognise in ourselves first and foremost and make changes where we're able. And then we look outward and think about whether we can ellicit change elsewhere or at least influence it. And, if we can't well then we think about our own boundaries, put them in place and en*** them And actually, if we relate that to the world of kink, that's no different to vetting/setting our own limits.
QXX666 Posted May 18, 2023 What was the point of this post?? The OP again chose a toxic topic she knew would create âpopcornâ effect, maybe the âattention seeking syndromeâ and ending the âdiscussion/chat â with some pantomime jokes with her ***rs. As usual the same people. Itâs disrespectful and an unnecessary use of the forum. I am not sure how it was allowed in the first place as itâs been discussed in the past with the same effect, the OP made it clear in her last paragraph she didnât care about it, so she wasnât concern about other opinions. may as well close it.Â
PJ**** Posted May 18, 2023 6 minutes ago, QXX666 said: What was the point of this post?? The OP again chose a toxic topic she knew would create âpopcornâ effect, maybe the âattention seeking syndromeâ and ending the âdiscussion/chat â with some pantomime jokes with her ***rs. As usual the same people. Itâs disrespectful and an unnecessary use of the forum. I am not sure how it was allowed in the first place as itâs been discussed in the past with the same effect, the OP made it clear in her last paragraph she didnât care about it, so she wasnât concern about other opinions. may as well close it. Like Bob Hoskins used to say... it's good to talk đ
ge**** Posted May 18, 2023 7 minutes ago, PJ3000 said: Like Bob Hoskins used to say... it's good to talk đ Ah but has he got an Ology? đđ¤Ł
QXX666 Posted May 18, 2023 50 minutes ago, PJ3000 said: Like Bob Hoskins used to say... it's good to talk đ Well heâs dead so it didnât help. Also there is a chat room for thatâŚÂ
CopperKnob Posted May 18, 2023 Author 58 minutes ago, QXX666 said: What was the point of this post?? The OP again chose a toxic topic she knew would create âpopcornâ effect, maybe the âattention seeking syndromeâ and ending the âdiscussion/chat â with some pantomime jokes with her ***rs. As usual the same people. Itâs disrespectful and an unnecessary use of the forum. I am not sure how it was allowed in the first place as itâs been discussed in the past with the same effect, the OP made it clear in her last paragraph she didnât care about it, so she wasnât concern about other opinions. may as well close it. The answer to your question is right there in the comments
QXX666 Posted May 18, 2023 43 minutes ago, gemini_man said: Ah but has he got an Ology? đ𤣠I hope you are not talking about me because that would be classified as an insult which is against the forum and site rules. At least I do not invade my sentences with Imojies galore like a child. Unless you need to emphasise your jokes? Pointless exerciseÂ
PJ**** Posted May 18, 2023 3 minutes ago, QXX666 said: Well heâs dead so it didnât help. Also there is a chat room for thatâŚÂ Yea have you tried having a serious conversation in the chat rooms!? đ Also what does him being dead have to do with it.. it's still sound advice đ
ge**** Posted May 18, 2023 5 minutes ago, QXX666 said: I hope you are not talking about me because that would be classified as an insult which is against the forum and site rules. At least I do not invade my sentences with Imojies galore like a child. Unless you need to emphasise your jokes? Pointless exercise You obviously don't know your BT ads of the 80s otherwise you'd know exactly what I was referring to đ As for how I choose to construct my sentences I'm perfectly happy with how I do so thank you but many thanks for the constructive criticism - I've considered it and decided it was criticism for the sake of criticism and therefore equally like a blunt pencil đ
PJ**** Posted May 18, 2023 10 minutes ago, QXX666 said: I hope you are not talking about me because that would be classified as an insult which is against the forum and site rules. At least I do not invade my sentences with Imojies galore like a child. Unless you need to emphasise your jokes? Pointless exercise Also separate point, but theres been studies that suggest people who use emojis regularly are better at communicating in general đ¤ food for thought
ge**** Posted May 18, 2023 17 minutes ago, QXX666 said: I hope you are not talking about me because that would be classified as an insult which is against the forum and site rules. At least I do not invade my sentences with Imojies galore like a child. Unless you need to emphasise your jokes? Pointless exercise P.S. even if my question were directed at you - I fail to see how asking it would be "classified as an insult" - it doesn't suggest you have or haven't got one, or are any the better or worse because you do/don't - so I'd suggest you were nitpicking for the sake of nitpicking Now perhaps as you suggested to CK you seem to be somewhat bothered and putting a lot of effort into trying to criticise - are you as equally obsessed as you earlier tried to suggest she was?
CopperKnob Posted May 18, 2023 Author 17 minutes ago, QXX666 said: I hope you are not talking about me because that would be classified as an insult which is against the forum and site rules. At least I do not invade my sentences with Imojies galore like a child. Unless you need to emphasise your jokes? Pointless exercise Talking about insults do we need a reminder when you openly called a member a dog and a piece of meat in the forums. How about when you called another member unwell simply because of their forum posts and it was clear that concerns for them was not your intent
Se**** Posted May 18, 2023 1 hour ago, PJ3000 said: Also separate point, but theres been studies that suggest people who use emojis regularly are better at communicating in general đ¤ food for thought I sincerely hope you have scientific reliable proof of this đ
Deleted Member Posted May 18, 2023 12 hours ago, CopperKnob said: If that's the lens who read it through so be it Just helping you fill that glass.
Yo**** Posted May 18, 2023 Wow. Iâm not even going to try and get involved in this one - I simply donât have the social skills needed just yet đ
Deleted Member Posted May 18, 2023 34 minutes ago, YorkshireBiker said: Wow. Iâm not even going to try and get involved in this one - I simply donât have the social skills needed just yet đ The only social skill you need to deal with a narcissist is running.
Se**** Posted May 18, 2023 34 minutes ago, Darksoul_85 said: The only social skill you need to deal with a narcissist is running. I can guess but Iâm not sure who exactly youâre implying is a narcissist in this comment. However, there really is no need for name calling. Please can we not do that? At the end of the day weâre all people with our own opinions and life experience and just because we donât agree doesnât mean we need to be rude. đ
Deleted Member Posted May 18, 2023 It isn't name-calling. Same as being a misandrist or misogynist or any sort of phobe. It is what it is. You can agree with a narcissist or disagree. It doesn't change what they are. You can disagree with the sky and it will still be blue. And if you ***t a zebra the lions will kill it.
FETMOD-KF Posted May 19, 2023 42 minutes ago, Darksoul_85 said: It isn't name-calling. Same as being a misandrist or misogynist or any sort of phobe. It is what it is. You can agree with a narcissist or disagree. It doesn't change what they are. You can disagree with the sky and it will still be blue. And if you ***t a zebra the lions will kill it. context is everything it's in disagreeing with the point rather than attacking the person. So yeah - saying someone is a narcissist, misandrist, whatever is name calling and it is both weak in debate and also not tolerated. please refrain.  we want to keep this thread open in the name of balanced discussion. But it feels there are people who cannot challenge or offer an alternate viewpoint without either descending to name calling or arguing in bad faith. neither of which are tolerated.  so, again. we ask for this to stop.Â
Recommended Posts