About us
We are looking for
We’re looking for
- Friends
- Kinky Dates
- LTR (relationship)
- Events & Places
- Networking
- NSA (no strings...)
- BDSM Lovers
Description
We’re a ‘normal’ couple with a ‘kinky side’. She recently wanted to experience some light BDSM such as being spanked, candle wax, being tied up etc, he found he enjoyed bringing her pleasure playing Dom.
We are still experimenting in this field and are interested in learning from another female/sharing an experience with another female.
We are a very caring couple. He can last hours and we assure you that your pleasure is our priority as we both get great pleasure from giving other’s pleasure.
Limits
We’re not into , , illegal stuff etc.
Our roles
I like:
I like:
Fetish.com gives you…
...something completely different! Find plenty of fascinating people to play with on Fetish.com. Looking for a hot third or sex party? Check out our free kinky dating area or our BDSM and Fetish Events to find the perfect play partner. Check out our sexy forum for kinky sex confessions. So, what are you waiting for?
Even in your examples, there would have been prior agreement and safe words. So again the Dom can only Dom because the Sub has agreed to that level.
Quite right. You’ve hit my point directly on the head with a better example too 😊
I have been giving this some thought and I believe that the perfect Dom is in reality a Sub.
The Dom get’s their pleasure from teasing the Sub to the point of becoming a quivering wreck, begging for relief, begging to be satisfied. At the point of teetering on frustration the Dom Read more…gives the Sub their reward, their pleasure.
So in reality, the Dom is pleasing the Sub with the build up and then further pleasing the Sub with the relief.
Of course it should be a two way street, whereby both are getting equal pleasure and relief, but that’s another discussion.
This one is about whether you agree with me, that a Dom is in effect actually a Sub or not.
Ironic how ghostface say’s don’t play stupid but puts the most stupid comment.
No where have I read that enjoying sex is a sin. The bible doesn’t go into detail about what you allow yourself to enjoy or not. Only holier than thou types put the restrictions on it. Pray for guidance, if under prayer Read more… and guidance it feels wrong, it is. If it doesn’t feel wrong and it isn’t crossing the sins, then it’s not wrong. Don’t worry what people think, let the pure of heart judge you.
I don’t feel dirty using this app at all. Perhaps the problem with society is that it expects everyone to fit in a box, one partner, one missionary position, one purpose, reproduction. I’m glad times have changed where it’s more acceptable to be yourself.
When I lived in Germany and nudity was far Read more… more acceptable than here in the UK it opened my eyes considerably. Men/women playing ball games naked on lake beaches, men/women swimming naked in pools or changing next to each other or in the sauna together. Nothing sexual about it, just natural. In fact it was us British people that sexualised it until we became so used to it.
Sure protect kids from apps such as these and nudity on other apps, but don’t send us back to the Victorian age where acts such as found on here still went ahead but sealed behind the thickest of doors.
Remove the attraction/sex from the situation. You’re only struggling with how to approach because ultimately you have one goal and you *** rejection. So don’t make it about that at all. Approach the same way you would a person you’d never be attracted to, think about how you met your friends, you Read more… got talking because you didn’t have the pressure on yourself.
We are still experimenting in this field and are interested in learning from another Read more… female/sharing an experience with another female.
We are a very caring couple. He can last hours and we assure you that your pleasure is our priority as we both get great pleasure from giving other’s pleasure.
We are clean, discreet and looking for social meets with a female for fun, flirting and maybe more.
We don’t believe in pressuring people, we much prefer natural progression.
Chrome: Im gonna eat you out.
Jenna: eep. Yes, Read more… Master!
.........
Jenna: Eat me out please, Master!
Chrome: (Chrome proceeds to flog the heck out of her)
............
Jenna: Eat me out please, Master!
Chrome: Sure thing, sugarlumps!
(Turned out to be 3...Oops)
All 3 are plausible but in the 3rd, Chrome would be subbing. Only the first 2 are dominant play. Jenna can consent to and get her cunnilingus, but only when Chrome agrees to give it...despite the consent always being present. In other words, she'll always get something she wants, but she doesnt know what that's going to be.
You're strapped to a spanking bench in the dungeon. You've done the text book checklist of what is and isn't OK. This is very text book, and in reality - in a lot of situations it isn't Read more… done, and isn't done before every play.
Even if you've agreed to every toy in the room. The Dominant controls what they use. How many. Intensity. Like, if they tap you lightly twice then say "Play is over" - then it's over.
Of course, yeah - there are some who will say they want a spanking warm up, then so many with which toy, then what toy - and direct when things should be changed << a valid form of play, but when the submissive is directing play (what some would call 'topping from the bottom') then again the situation is not one of "Dominance and submission"
--
Without wishing to twist thing. Again when you're strapped to a spanking bench in the dungeon. If the Dominant say, touches you without consent, hits you too hard, uses a toy that WASN'T agreed to - so on - how do you stop it? Safeword? What if they don't stop? Even if it does, they already did something you weren't happy with.
There's been situations where dubious consent has been used by Dominants as they've then used "the submissive was in control" as a defence.
Like, a lot of people think they would say stop, or no, or safeword if somethign wasn't right - but then on the spot, often don't.