Website Logo
LoginSignup
English

Who's Really in Control in a Dominant Submissive Relationship?

Are you in a Dominant submissive relationship? Writer Sienna Saint-Cyr shares her thoughts on how her Dom helps her with everything from riding the train alone to overcoming deep trauma. She explains what submission means to her and why the illusion of control in a D/s relationship is just that... an illusion.

 

When in a D/s relationship, who has the power and who is really in control? Some will say the Dom/Domme, while others insist it’s actually the submissive. I feel both are in control but in different ways, and both are powerful in different ways.

 

sign up banner fetish.com

 

Who's in control in a Dominant submissive relationship? 

As a submissive, I choose to submit to my Dominant. He doesn’t *** me. So while he’s in control when I’m submitting to him, the fact that I’m choosing to submit takes things to a level of equality. There is also a wonderful power in letting go of my power. To be able to feel it in me and hand it over willingly is freeing. It also has benefits that I don’t have access to when I’m in my Domme place.

For example, my Dom helps me be a better person. He encourages me to try harder and do things I’m afraid of. Even when I’m having a full panic attack, he’ll instruct me to calm down, reassure me that I can handle it, then tell me to do the thing I’m freaking out over. Sometimes it’s something simple, like riding a train alone.  Other times he might help out more, or go with me because it’s a bigger *** that might involve triggering. The bottom line, though, is that he offers me tough love. He doesn’t let me give in to my anxiety, and that helps me grow. This is only something I gain while I’m submitting. So for me, in our Dominant submissive relationship, submission is power.

 

Woman in collar and chain Dominant submissive relationship
For some people, submission is power in their Dominant submissive relationship.
 

Tough love

When I’m in my Domme space, I also encourage submissives to face ***s. To learn and to grow. I give tough love, as well. It’s just as helpful to them as it is to me when I’m being urged to face something I don’t want to face. Facing ***s is hard. Dealing with trauma is hard. Accepting who we are and making changes to better ourselves is hard. But when we have a Dominant at our back telling us, we can do it, that gives us power as well. Even in Domme space I grow and face things I’m struggling with. Especially if a submissive has been really good or begged properly because I want to reward them even if that reward might be triggering for me trauma is hard.

While dominating someone, I’m in complete control. Yet I’m also not. Because the sub can safe word at any time, and I stop whatever is happening. I may push the submissive’s boundaries with consent to do so, but still, the one really dictating that scenario is the submissive. So who really has the power in a Dominant submissive relationship?

In healthy D/s, both parties have power. Both have control. Both can help the other learn and grow, only through different means. The power and control exerted are given, not taken. And it’s in this place of giving—handing over control—that I find the real power.

 

Sienna Saint-Cyr writes erotica and blogs about kink, poly, body image, most things relating.


Signup banner fetish.com

 

Does this article ring true for you? What is your opinion on control in a Dominant submissive relationship? Share all in the Fetish.com forum.
Join the discussion in the BDSM forum | Fetish.com

Images: via Shutterstock.com
2 Comments

Add a comment


    Related Discussions

    Related Discussions

    The pleasure of a brat and the patience of a Dom.

    There is something fascinating about a brat who refuses to make things easy for a Dom. The teasing, the resistance, the little challenges, the deliberate attempts to provoke a reaction. Not because she doesn’t want his attention, but because sometimes she wants to feel just how much of it she can awaken in him. And perhaps the most interesting part is that a good Dom doesn’t simply want obedience. He enjoys the challenge. He learns to appreciate the mind behind the defiance, the personality behind the attitude, and the emotions hidden beneath every little act of rebellion. He teases her back. He surprises her. He finds his own ways to get under her skin, to occupy a little space in her thoughts without demanding it. And slowly, almost without noticing, he finds himself becoming more interested in the game, not because he needs to win, but because he genuinely enjoys the person he’s playing with. There is a particular pleasure in knowing that the brat you chose, quietly and deliberately, is still being her unapologetic self with you. And that behind every challenge, every refusal, every attempt to test your patience, there might be a desire to discover whether you’re capable of understanding her, handling her, and taking care of her without ever needing to take away the very thing that makes her who she is. Because a brat shouldn’t have to stop being a brat to feel safe with her Dom. And a Dom shouldn’t have to stop being himself to earn her trust. Perhaps the real game begins when two minds start occupying each other’s thoughts, both pretending to be in control, both enjoying the fact that neither is quite as unaffected as they would like the other to believe. Every reference is purely random but if you felt involved maybe not 😉 48 Likes 11 Replies· 4 days ago

    Submission Is Earned, Too: A Warning About Men Who Call Themselves Doms

    An alpha submissive’s perspective on performative dominance, misplaced trust, and knowing when to take your power back. There is a particular kind of man in the kink community who mistakes a woman’s willingness to submit for evidence of his own dominance. He knows the vocabulary. He understands the aesthetic. He can deliver a command with confidence, administer a respectable spanking, and occasionally produce a well-timed “good girl.” And somehow, he believes that makes him a Dominant. Gentlemen, we need to talk. I’m an alpha submissive. Outside of a dynamic, I’m independent, assertive, accomplished, and exceptionally comfortable being the person in charge. Submission isn’t something that happens to me because I lack the capacity to lead. It’s something I consciously choose to offer to someone whose character, competence, and consistency make surrender appealing. That distinction matters. Because recently, I found myself reminded that a man can be intelligent, educated, charismatic, sexually confident, and still be profoundly underqualified for the authority he wants you to give him. The Difference Between Dominance and Entitlement I had an ongoing connection with a man who presented himself as an experienced Dominant. He was intelligent. Cunning, even. Confident enough to be intriguing, and perceptive enough that I genuinely believed there might be something worth exploring. There was chemistry. There was familiarity. There was an established history between us. And there were moments when I caught glimpses of what the dynamic could have been. That’s perhaps the most frustrating part. It wasn’t that he was entirely incapable of showing up. It was that he demonstrated just enough awareness of what I needed to make his consistent failure to deliver all the more disappointing. He enjoyed my submission. He enjoyed the attention, the sexual access, the provocative exchanges, and the gratification of knowing that a strong-willed woman was willing to yield to him. What he didn’t consistently demonstrate was an equivalent investment in the experience he expected me to participate in. And that is where the distinction between dominance and entitlement becomes ***fully clear. A Dominant cultivates submission. An entitled man simply expects it. A Spanking Is Not a Personality Let’s address something that seems to confuse a remarkable number of men in this lifestyle. Being physically assertive does not automatically make you a competent Dominant. Neither does having a commanding voice, an impressive collection of toys, or a talent for telling a woman what to do. Those are tools. Dominance is what you do with them. A meaningful D/s dynamic requires curiosity about your partner, an understanding of their psychological and physical responses, communication, negotiation, attentiveness, and the willingness to learn what actually works for the person submitting to you. Not what worked on the last woman. Not what you’ve watched in pornography. Not what makes you feel particularly masculine. What works for her. I don’t expect perfection. I do, however, expect effort. I expect a man who wants to explore my submission to be genuinely interested in discovering what makes it fulfilling. And if I’m investing my vulnerability, my trust, and my energy into a dynamic, I expect more than the occasional command and a self-satisfied assumption that I must be having a wonderful time. Because here’s a little secret: A submissive can be compliant without being fulfilled. She can follow instructions without feeling connected. She can respond to your authority without respecting the way you exercise it. And she can enjoy individual encounters while recognizing that the dynamic itself is going absolutely nowhere. The Danger of Falling in Love With Potential This is where I have to hold myself accountable. I saw potential. Worse, I saw flashes of exactly the kind of dominance I find compelling. There was a particular moment when this man demonstrated genuine tenderness alongside authority. He held me, allowed me to settle into a vulnerability I rarely offer, and followed that intimacy with the kind of confident, playful direction that makes submission feel natural rather than demanded. It was effortless. And it was lovely. It also showed me that he understood, at least in that moment, what I had been trying to communicate. But one beautiful moment does not constitute a healthy dynamic. One well-executed interaction does not erase a pattern of inconsistency. And the occasional glimpse of the man someone could be is not a substitute for the man he repeatedly chooses to be. I think this is an especially important lesson for experienced submissives. We often pride ourselves on our ability to read people, negotiate boundaries, and distinguish genuine authority from theatrics. But intelligence does not eliminate emotional investment. Experience does not make us immune to wishful thinking. And sometimes, the very qualities that make us thoughtful partners also make us exceptionally talented at rationalizing another person’s lack of effort. We understand nuance. We recognize complexity. We give people room to grow. Until one day, we realize we’re doing all the growing for both of us. Submission Is Not a Subscription Service Perhaps my greatest frustration was the realization that this man seemed perfectly content to maintain access to the aspects of our dynamic that benefited him, without making a comparable effort toward the experience I had clearly articulated wanting. And no, I’m not suggesting that a Dominant owes a submissive a romantic relationship. He doesn’t. Nor does submission create an obligation to provide financial support, emotional caretaking, or any particular relationship structure. But both parties owe one another honesty about what they are willing and able to offer. If someone has made their expectations clear, you don’t get to keep encouraging their investment while conveniently avoiding the conversations that might jeopardize your access to them. That’s not dominance. That’s convenience dressed in authority. A casual dynamic can be wonderful when both people genuinely want one. A strictly sexual power exchange can be deeply fulfilling when its boundaries are understood and respected. But when one person wants something more intentional, consistent, or psychologically engaging, the answer isn’t to offer just enough to keep them interested. The answer is to communicate honestly and allow them to make an informed choice. Consent is ongoing. So is the obligation to respect the terms under which someone’s participation is offered. Protecting Yourself From the Wrong Dominant We spend considerable time in kink communities discussing physical safety. And rightly so. We talk about hard limits, safewords, aftercare, negotiation, and risk awareness. But I think we need to spend more time discussing the quieter forms of self-protection. Protecting your time. Protecting your emotional investment. Protecting your ability to recognize when a dynamic has become one-sided. Protecting yourself from mistaking someone else’s confidence for competence. And perhaps most importantly, protecting yourself from the belief that being a good submissive means endlessly accommodating a disappointing Dominant. It doesn’t. A title is not a credential. Experience is not proof of character. And a man’s desire to be called “Sir” tells you absolutely nothing about whether he’s worthy of hearing it. Watch how he responds when you express a need that doesn’t directly benefit him. Watch whether he remembers what you’ve told him. Watch whether he can accept correction without treating it as insubordination. Watch whether his interest in your pleasure extends beyond the parts that gratify his ego. And watch what happens when you stop doing all the work. You may learn more from that silence than you ever did from his commands. The Most Powerful Thing I Did Was Walk Away Ultimately, I ended the dynamic. Not because I stopped finding him attractive. Not because every interaction was disappointing. And certainly not because I suddenly decided submission wasn’t for me. I walked away because I recognized that I was continuing to invest in something that wasn’t developing into what I wanted, despite having made my expectations clear. I could respect the man as a person and still conclude that he was not the Dominant for me. I could acknowledge the moments I enjoyed without allowing them to excuse the pattern I didn’t. And I could care about someone without continuing to make myself available on terms that left me dissatisfied. That’s an important distinction. Walking away wasn’t an act of defiance against dominance. It was an act of respect for my own submission. Because the entire point of consensual power exchange is that the power being exchanged belongs to the people participating. It is offered voluntarily. It remains subject to boundaries. And it can be withdrawn. To My Fellow Submissives Please stop confusing your capacity to endure disappointment with your capacity to submit. They are not the same thing. You do not become a better submissive by making yourself smaller so that an inadequate Dominant can feel bigger. You do not prove your devotion by accepting inconsistency. And you do not owe continued access to someone simply because you’ve already invested time, trust, or vulnerability. Your submission has value. Not because you’re difficult to control. Not because you’re successful, independent, or particularly strong-willed. But because it is yours. It is an intimate, deliberate expression of trust that deserves to be met with respect, competence, and genuine reciprocity. The right Dominant won’t need you to diminish yourself to make his authority feel legitimate. He’ll understand that the strength you bring to the dynamic is part of what makes your surrender meaningful. And until someone demonstrates that he understands the difference? Keep your standards. Keep your boundaries. Keep your power. Because being willing to kneel does not mean being obligated to kneel for just anyone. And sometimes, the most profoundly submissive thing you can do for your own well-being is stand up, straighten your crown, and walk the hell away. ----------------------------------------------------- What are the additional things you would add from your own experiences about what's needed or missing? 211 Likes 48 Replies· about 11 hours ago

    Is submission more meaningful when it's a choice?

    I've been thinking about what makes submission appealing, particularly for men who are otherwise independent and accustomed to being in control of their own lives. I think there's a difference between submitting because you need someone to take charge and submitting because you've found someone you actually want to follow. Maybe I'm reading too much into it, but I suspect that distinction matters. For me, there's something incredibly attractive about a woman who doesn't need to demand authority. She just has it. It might be her confidence, her intelligence, or the way she carries herself. Maybe it's the way she looks at you, or that little smile when she knows exactly what you're thinking. And of course there's the physical attraction. Her curves, the way she moves, the softness of her skin. I'm not going to pretend those things don't matter. But I've met beautiful women who did absolutely nothing for me beyond being beautiful. There's something different about a woman whose presence alone makes you want to give up a little control. Not because you can't make your own decisions or manage your own life. You simply enjoy the thought of putting yourself in her hands. Which brings me to something I'm curious about. For the dominant women here, does it make a difference when a man is otherwise independent and assertive? Is there something particularly satisfying about a man who could take the lead but chooses to follow yours? Or am I making a distinction that doesn't really matter? I'd be interested to hear your thoughts. 39 Likes 12 Replies· 4 days ago

    The Night I Played with Control

    I went to the bar with a stupid idea: to understand what makes people tick when the masks come off. Just me, a few drinks, and a room full of people pretending to be something they’re not. Then I met her. She talked tough, laughed too loudly, and kept checking if I was paying attention. She told me she was curious about submission. I asked her what that actually meant to her. She gave me the usual answer. I smiled. People think they know themselves until somebody asks the right question. We spent hours talking about dominance, submission, trust, and that delicious contradiction of wanting to lose control while desperately needing to feel safe. The interesting part wasn’t the ropes, the commands, or the games people played with their bodies. It was what happened inside their heads when they finally stopped pretending. Walking home, I lit a cigarette and thought about our conversation. Maybe people don’t always want someone to control them. Sometimes, they just want someone who can see through their bullshit. Or maybe I’m just another asshole who likes to think he understands people. 39 Likes 3 Replies· 11 days ago

    How to identify yourself as a Dom

    Im finding it hard to put a precise Dom label on myself. There are aspects of being a Daddy Dom that I strongly identify with such as caring for my sub as well my preferred method of punishment being spanking. However, I am really into DDLG. I enjoy aspects of Master/Slave, though I prefer to be called Daddy and outside of certain rules and punishments, I want my sub to make their own decisions and do things they like without requiring my permission. The obvious path that I fit into is Brat Tamer, but I enjoy the additional elements from other avenues. Do other Doms have this issue? Any advice or anecdotes that could help me communicate this to would be subs so that there is no miscommunication? 28 Likes 10 Replies· 11 days ago